03-02-2007, 11:46 AM
Pagemaster, you asked why one should oppose this repeal, and since Groot noted he hadn't time to repeat what he said at Jolt, I went over there and brought his response to this rrepeal proposal here.
There's no question in my mid that the sponsor of the repela played fast-and-loose with the trut; that alone is a reason not to support the repeal.
And from reading through the Jolt thread, I get the impression that others did not care for the way the author of the repeal played fast and loose with the facts, as well as the apparent political motive of a group that is seeking wholesale repeals of resolutions with whatever cooked up reasons they can concoct as part of a broader agenda of their own (even the tactic of not having replacement resolutions in place.
In other words, this is another one of *those* repeals that have been comeing along for the last several months. That too, is a reason, to vote against the repeal.
There's no question in my mid that the sponsor of the repela played fast-and-loose with the trut; that alone is a reason not to support the repeal.
And from reading through the Jolt thread, I get the impression that others did not care for the way the author of the repeal played fast and loose with the facts, as well as the apparent political motive of a group that is seeking wholesale repeals of resolutions with whatever cooked up reasons they can concoct as part of a broader agenda of their own (even the tactic of not having replacement resolutions in place.
In other words, this is another one of *those* repeals that have been comeing along for the last several months. That too, is a reason, to vote against the repeal.