Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 1,371
» Latest member: VincentPlofe
» Forum threads: 2,320
» Forum posts: 24,739

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 37 online users.
» 1 Member(s) | 36 Guest(s)

Latest Threads
Heartbeat of the Mountain...
Forum: International Affairs
Last Post: Democratic Republic Of Eiria
Yesterday, 08:27 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 686
Charter of the League of ...
Forum: Law Library
Last Post: Librarian
Yesterday, 01:36 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 983
IDU Advent Calendar 2026
Forum: IDU Newswire
Last Post: Lauchenoiria
Yesterday, 01:13 AM
» Replies: 11
» Views: 344
Eirian Anecdotes
Forum: IDU Newswire
Last Post: Democratic Republic Of Eiria
11-03-2026, 06:25 AM
» Replies: 20
» Views: 8,091
Request for Special Envoy...
Forum: Political & Human Rights Council
Last Post: Eldid
10-28-2026, 04:51 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 173
We Who Are Broken (Aurora...
Forum: International Affairs
Last Post: Lauchenoiria
10-28-2026, 03:12 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 1,697
Auria Looks Onward
Forum: IDU Newswire
Last Post: Democratic Republic Of Eiria
10-23-2026, 03:00 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 67
2024 IDU Film Festival
Forum: Film Festivals
Last Post: Laeral
10-18-2026, 04:58 AM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 1,701
Slate of Security Council...
Forum: Voting Floor
Last Post: Xiomera
10-02-2026, 04:32 PM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 233
LIDUN Membership Administ...
Forum: League Headquarters
Last Post: Eldid
09-22-2026, 08:10 PM
» Replies: 25
» Views: 9,922

 
  Gardavasque sends Greetings
Posted by: Gardavasque - 12-01-2018, 03:10 AM - Forum: Immigration Bureau - Replies (2)

Warmth of the day to all in this place! I bring goodwill and good intent to members of the International Democratic Union on behalf of gracious people of Gardavasque. We seek membership in the IDU to advance the cause of human dignity and democratic principles in the world.

Print this item

  Europeian Letter update
Posted by: Vlaska - 11-26-2018, 02:29 AM - Forum: Embassy of Europeia - Replies (2)

[Image: ClGccF8.png?1]

Produced By: JayDee

In a special edition from the Europeian Letter, we have a full feature from the EBC and an interview of Cormac, former Pharaoh of Osiris, by Minister HEM.

With the entire world descending into chaos with declarations of war flying left and right, our very own Vice President decided to take the time to sit down and discuss his own personal opinion on the future of foreign policy. With the abolition of the IJCC, there is much uncertainty in the Independent Sphere of who drives the reins anymore.

Europeia itself has almost always found itself involved in multiple foreign fiascos. From the recent threat of Francoism from NPO to the 2016 and even earlier 2013 coup of Osiris. To talk about some of Europeia’s foreign past foreign policy decisions and recent gameplay changes is Cormac. A traditional adversary of Europeia who still finds room for agreement on a regular basis.

Where To Go From Here

Written By: Pierce

After the disbanding of the IJCC, foreign policy experts and citizens alike are left wondering what’s next for Europeia’s foreign policy, and may be concerned on what changes Europeia should make to expand its foreign affairs. Those worried over these concerns should set their minds at ease.

The idea to expand our foreign affairs portfolio is not a new one. Last term, former Minister of Foreign Affairs Rach announced intentions to build ties with The Communist Bloc and Forest, and former President Drexlore proposed a Pact of Non-aggression to the Senate for consideration, which has since been revised with Attorney General Drecq to develop its language after former Speaker Pichtonia raised concerns that the first draft was “not within our standards”; the legislation has since passed. When Europeia’s foreign affairs became somewhat strained after the dereliction of the duties to head of state by previous Presidents, the controversies surrounding the IJCC, and the backlash revolving around the acceptance of Mare Nostrum’s ambassador from our allies, experts began to look at other rising powers in NationStates in the event that the IJCC did disband.

Those paying attention to Gameplay have noticed that there has been a new generation of growing and promising regions that are separate from the cliques of the big UCRs and GCRs of the game. With large and active populations and diversely structured governments, these rising regions have brought the attention of experts within the spheres of UCRs and GCRs. Such realignments are nothing new to NS foreign affairs. There are many that remember a time in which monarchist UCRs led by Cobi Grey, Neisse, Onder, and others became prominent in NSGP, giving way to many large British regions such as the Kingdom of Great Britain, the British Isles, and the other British-themed precursors of those regions. Those regions are no longer powerbrokers as they once were, although the Land of Kings and Emperors remains relevant on the NSGP stage arguably thanks to Onder’s influence behind the scenes. Among the successors to those regions are Pax Britannia and the Empire of Mare Nostrum.

Pax Britannia was a region that separated from the British Isles after a disagreement on having the elections of the region’s leaders and regional business based on the forum, so the founders of Pax Britannia separated with their own region. The region was active based on the NS site for some time, and remains as such. While it doesn’t have a population over 100, its participants did seem more active in the region than the British Isles did at the time with over 100 nations. The British Isles is now dead with their former King John now reigning over the Kingdom of Great Britain, and its last King influential in EMN (and formerly in LKE).

In the Land of Kings and Emperors, the former PM known as Mega, had a falling out with their Imperial Family after falsely accusing the former Emperor Onder of allegedly importing citizens to influence another candidate against him, and essentially broke away from LKE, moving to his region of Mare Nostrum which had been founded earlier. Since splintering from the LKE, its growth has been impressive. Since the fourth of August this year, its population grew to a height of 239 nations on the 27th of September, and has conducted regular missions. While it’s uncertain how many of those nations are actually puppets, the region has had an active forum community and recently conducted raids with Osiris. While former President Drexlore did issue a statement from Goldenblock banning the ERN from working with EMN, the recent decision to accept Thomas Insaniac, Legatus Prefect of EMN, as their ambassador shows that the Administration is open to working with new and rising regions.

There are some in foreign affairs circles abroad that believe that Europeia is too close to the “Ondersphere”, a term used to describe the sphere of influence by former LKE Emperor Onder as a respected raider, who remains influential in LKE policymaking and serves as Europeia’s Chief Justice. It has been suggested by those watching the Sopo Administration that allowing an ambassador from EMN is a signal that Europeia is distancing itself from the so-called “Ondersphere” as the IJCC’s future became uncertain.

Those that are worried about such challenges and obstacles should set their minds at ease. President Sopo and Minister of Foreign Affairs HEM made it clear in a recent statement from the Goldenblock that enabling dialogue with new and rising regions with similar ideologies does not necessarily mean that we are turning our backs on our allies; and the recent discussions on the NSGP forums regarding the Balder leaks (the report of which only served to stir the pot) have highlighted that while the allied regions do have disagreements with one another, all parties will and have always had frank and open dialogues within and among each other. It is unlikely that the traditional establishments of Europeian foreign policy buckle since we have always been able to have those open and honest disagreements with our allies, but if they do, the Sopo Administration’s aim to “refine our independence” by building bridges and new dialogues will ensure that Europeia remains a leading UCR for the Independent ideology. If anything, these bold new steps should serve as an assurance that Europeia is able to look after its own interests while working with its valuable allies rather than being directly under the influence of an individual. It should be noted that even though the IJCC has officially disbanded its structure and despite certain recent strains, Europeia will continue to hold close ties and cooperation with Balder and the Land of Kings and Emperors.

In addition to the worries that revolved around IJCC, the WALL organization may also be facing competition from a rising WA organization known as the Interregional Legislative Coalition (ILC) formed by former Delegate Courelli of the Social Liberal Union (population of 116 nations, 480 at its height) and President Ivory Rhodes of the Democratic Socialist Assembly (population of 348 nations). Its membership is mainly composed of ideologically leftist or liberal regions including SLU, DSA, The Internationale, The Versutian Federation, and most recently The Communist Bloc (whom of which some foreign policy experts last term hoped would have entered WALL). According to its Charter, its purpose is to “promote our shared values of unity, fundamental equality, democracy, and internationalism within the World Assembly”. When I was Delegate of the Social Liberal Union before the ILC came into existence, it was a goal for the region to expand its FA and political portfolio to draw attention from the big regions through such an alliance. While they don’t have nearly as many votes in the WA (the WALL has about 2,179 votes compared the ILC’s 535), as an outsider, the SLU and DSA have achieved the expansion of their portfolio and TCB’s membership further legitimizes the organization as it grows. In order to counter this rising competition, the Europeia’s Ministry of World Assembly Affairs should work with the WALL organization to seek out other regions to absorb into the organization to maintain its place on the WA stage.

It is also worth noting that the war against NPO presents a unique opportunity for Europeia to build stronger bonds with regions that also oppose the NPO and its Francoist ideology. The ideology itself is, in the words of President Sopo, “at the very core… an ideology that demeans our stature as a region and questions our very right to exist, let alone co-exist”. With NPO being an existential threat to all UCRs and with other UCRs following our lead already in pushing for war against their ideology, all UCRs in NationStates now have a common enemy to fight. Having this common enemy presents us the opportunity to continue taking the lead through the ERN with TBH in the fight against Francoism, and to build new ties with other regions to take our place once again as the UCR of UCRs.

While we should not abandon our allies, Europeia must continue to network and seek out new friendships and alliances to increase its influence as a prominent Independent and political UCR; having dialogue with new regions does not necessarily mean that we are turning our backs on our allies, but it means that we do not hold ourselves exclusive to the established orders and that we’re able to make proactive foreign policy decisions ourselves. If any of our current allies find this problematic, then we must begin to question exactly what sort of relationship we have with allied regions and the influential policymakers behind them. By networking with these new and rising regions, we expand our prominence beyond simply the old powers and cliques of already powerful GCRs and UCRs, some of which such as Osiris who have taken note. By opening the necessary dialogue to expand our prominence and taking a lead in the War on Francoism, we will be able to take the mantle in order to become a leading region with a powerful voice at the table, a similar vision that we had at the beginnings of the IJCC.

Interview with Cormac

Interview By: HEM

HEM:

Hey Cormac, thanks for agreeing to this interview! A little context for you and the readers: I'm looking on doing a series of interviews with traditional "adversaries" of Europeia as an opportunity to both create dialogue and hopefully exchange ideas between folks who don't always get to have civil discourse that often!

For you, particularly, I'd be interested in starting at the beginning. The wayyyy beginning, you were actually a Senator in Europeia. In broad strokes, could you take us from your journey of being a officeholder in Europeia to being a little more Euro-skeptical (lol) over the years?

Cormac:

Happy to participate! Sure. Well, I should start by saying despite being an adversary there are still many things I respect about Europeia. That doesn't always come across in the heat of the moment. But I did have some very nice things to say about Europeia in a newspaper article I wrote quite some time ago, and I stand by those.

That said, I think the beginning of my issues with Europeia was after I made a decision years ago to become a defender. Despite the region billing itself as an independent region, my experience of that was Europeia was incredibly hostile to defenders even if defenders weren't particularly hostile to Europeia. I think over time that just spiraled into noticing more inconsistencies about Europeia's approach, particularly in foreign affairs but internally as well. It bothers me when people say they're about one thing but turn out to be about something else entirely, and I feel like there are elements of that in Europeia.

HEM:

Well, I'm not sure there is any person or ideology in Nationstates that has ever been perfectly consistent. I remember not so long ago writing a series of articles that laid out occasions in which the Founderless Region Alliance (FRA) invaded regions. I'm wondering if you'd be willing to be a little more specific on the inconsistencies so we might be able to talk through some of them?

Cormac:

Well, I should note when I talk about inconsistency I don't just mean changing one's mind about something. I would be the last one to be critical of that. :p I just mean inconsistency in the sense of there being a divide between the message and the action, if that makes sense.

Some other examples of inconsistency include Europeia's opposition to interregional organizations in its treaties, which at one point nearly became an issue for regions that joined Sovereign Confederation, but not having any issue with the UIAF, the ISRA, or more recently, the IJCC which Europeia itself joined. There were also the times that Europeia first supported a coup of Osiris in 2013, then opposed one in 2016 despite the reasoning behind them being broadly similar. It has always seemed to me that Europeia's standards shift and are very situational. But that is somewhat to be expected in a democracy where leadership changes and maybe perspectives change over time. The issue in Europeia is it seems like no one wants to acknowledge there has been any change and wants to pretend everything is still consistent with past actions and philosophies.

Another recent example is of course the issue with Osiris, where we saw inconsistencies in Europeia's stance on maintaining sovereignty over its military, and its moderate raiding principles and when those principles apply and don't apply.

HEM:

In regards to the Osiris situation, having a sheer three years between two events can make it pretty difficult to be fully consistent haha. I mean our leadership turned over, there are different actors involved, and things might've changed. EDIT: I wasn't fully active in 2013, so I don't know the full particulars of that situation, but I think it's a bit unfair comparing events that far apart

With the IJCC I think the fact that we specifically revised past agreements to emphasize ultimate sovereignty with the respective regions would show folks our commitment to regional sovereignty. We ensured that it was possible for friends to deal with Europeia and not with the IJCC if they chose, and ensured that we had the ultimate say in whatever our troops did or did not do. Maybe that could've been communicated more proactively? I definitely agree that there's been some communication problem in that regards.

Cormac:

It's true that the passage of time definitely makes a comparison of Europeia's differing responses to the two coups in Osiris complicated. To be fair, there were also key differences that likely contributed to a differing response, but the difference in approach was so night and day that it was jarring. Is it really relevant now? Not particularly, except in response to how my own history of an adversarial relationship with Europeia came about.

I do think sometimes the biggest problem for Europeia is a lack of communication, which again, I do think is somewhat owed to the frequent changes in leadership resulting from your democratic system. It can be hard to always keep straight who has communicated what and with whom. Communication definitely seemed to play a role in the IJCC problem with Osiris, and I think it has at other times as well. Communication is obviously a two-way street, but sometimes other regions don't know what they should be communicating with Europeia about until a contentious issue has already developed. I think particularly at a time Europeia is considering reforms, it may want to look at making sure there is more institutional continuity in terms of foreign affairs, so communication can be improved.

HEM:

I don't disagree there. Pivoting to a new topic, how do you see a region like Europeia which has been predominately political fitting into a Nationstates that seems to be tilting a bit more toward casual, social activities rather than hardcore political ones. Even more broadly speaking, what do you see the game as a whole looking like?

Cormac:

That tilt has been bad for gameplay, in my view. It has made everything more personal, far too often these days even on an OOC level, and it has really dragged down the game. I would ideally like to see Europeia resisting that trend, as Europeia has always been one of the more politically oriented regions. That said, I'm not sure anyone can really resist it. Sometimes cultural change is so strong that you just have to adapt to it, and I interpret your question as being more how can we adapt to this change than stop it.

I don't really know the answer to that. I think it has to involve finding some aspect of the game that can interest people politically, but without personal toxicity entering into it. The old gameplay interests aren't doing that anymore. I think the key might be in focusing more on the World Assembly, because I think there is still enough distance between what the WA does and the social aspects of gameplay that there is room for political intrigue there without a lot of hurt feelings and OOC toxicity. I definitely think regions are going to have to find a way to move past old ways of doing things though, because those just aren't working with the new social media-like environment.

HEM:

I definitely agree that the increased OOC-ness of the game has led to more nastiness, and quite frankly a game that resembles more of a high school cafeteria that a political simulation game. What do you think has led to some of these changes? I know someone people (me) have placed some blame on the proliferation of Discord, but I'm also sure it's more complicated than just that.

Cormac:

I think it's a broader trend on the internet. Everything has become so much more personal now compared to several years ago. You often can't get in a RL political debate with people without them getting personally offended and thinking you're a terrible person either. I do think Discord has contributed to the problem, in that it has become a medium for NS that is similar to the role played by Facebook and Twitter in RL. It has brought everyone together more, which is good, but it has also contributed to everyone being everyone's friend and feeling close with them, which can make politics quite difficult. It's much easier to separate being political rivals with someone from any personal feelings when they're not telling you their life story like a friend would in RL.

We've always had communication mediums, like IRC and Skype, but they weren't as accessible and user-friendly as Discord. So everyone wasn't using them constantly, and more time was spent on the actual game. That has changed thanks to Discord, in my view.

HEM:

Pivoting back to gameplay, how would you go about describing the current geopolitical situation of NS? There has clearly been a bit of a shift over the past few years, and I'm interested to know who you see as key players and key regions.

Cormac:

The GCRs are really dominating the geopolitical scene. I think you still have spheres of influence that go back quite a long time, even though the more traditional R/D dichotomy has mostly broken down by now. For example, in TSP and TRR, which I would identify as key players for their sphere, you have many of the same people you had in the FRA and UDL or people who think broadly like them. And then on the other side of the coin you have Balder, Europeia, and The LKE. So there are a bit of the old rivalries, transferred to new regions. But a lot has changed too. I think you see regions like TEP, TWP, and Osiris occupying a middle ground that makes them more interesting than they have been in a while, because they could determine who ends up being able to wield geopolitical power to their benefit.

HEM:

Yeah, I broadly agree with that assessment. Speaking of some of those regions, you and others have launched a lot of accusations about the Europeia-Balder-LKE sphere, often claiming that certain regions control the others. Would you still say that's true today, and if so, would you elaborate?

Cormac:

That's a tough answer to pin down, honestly, because I think it's a fluid situation. There's a lot of overlap between those three regions, and I think you end up with different players having more influence at different times. Right now, it seems like The LKE's interests are moving more to the forefront, because the emphasis on power projection through the IJCC and exclusionary policies like the many PNGs in Balder are much more The LKE's M.O. It's unusual to see Europeia participating in an interregional organization at all, as it was skeptical of them for years. And Balder used to be a much more open region, and I'm not even talking about the distant past -- this has been a change that's happened just over the past year or two. So I think The LKE is definitely in the driver's seat, to a degree.

That said, I don't think it's totally accurate to ever say one region controls the others. It's more that there's so much overlap that a particular culture and way of thinking becomes dominant in all three regions. Right now, it seems like that's The LKE's culture and way of thinking, but in the past I've seen Europeia play a bigger role. Oddly, I've never really observed Balder having much of that influence over the other two regions.

HEM:

Your analysis above seems like an even-keeled and thoughtful response regardless of if I totally agree or not. But it seems like some of the public rhetoric is much more explosive, openly calling for couping Balder and overthrowing it's userrite captors. Do you think people are just being dramatic, or do folks believe that?

Cormac:

Public rhetoric often tends to happen in the heat of the moment these days. I do think a lot of people do see UCRs exerting a lot of influence over a Sinker, and that bothers them, primarily because they've never seen it reciprocated. As I mentioned, I can't think of a time I've seen Balder influencing the other two regions the same way they sometimes influence Balder and each other. I think there's a general feeling that Balder should be more than it is, and that it's being held back from its full potential. So I think that part is real. Some of the rhetoric I think is hyperbole. I think many people wish Balderans themselves, including the Queen, would do more to shake things up in Balder and wield more influence. We want to see Balder reach its real potential.

I also think there are many people who believe Solorni simply isn't going to do that, and that others are either incapable of doing it because Onder and NES exercise so much political power there, or are in league with them and don't want to try to make changes. So I think that's why you see people wanting Balder to be "couped," or "liberated" as some have put it. Because they think there is no hope for meaningful change through any peaceful means.

HEM:

Yeah, I just think it's very difficult to have reasonable discourse about Balder. I know I made a few posts during one of the more explosive arguments and I basically got ignored. Specifically, I responded to Altino's assertions that multiple natives have gone to her saying that their region is under siege from the LKE — which I found pretty implausible.

I guess I'm skeptical of Balder being worse off than most generic feeders/sinkers and see this more as pointed criticism toward players who just aren't "popular" in the public sphere. Honestly speaking, in the long arc of history, most feeders/sinkers have been inactive most of the time.

Cormac:

That's true. The natural state of Sinkers, in particular, is to be inactive -- I'm convinced of that. Sinker communities are always struggling against that natural tendency toward inactivity. That isn't just true of Balder, by any means.

I think a lot of the issue with Balder is seeing people at the top who are so strongly connected to The LKE and Europeia. Although we've seen that in other Feeders and Sinkers in the past, we don't see it much anymore. We don't see people who are prominent and very involved in UCRs at the top of Feeders and Sinkers much these days. So I think when people see that, and maybe see them doing more in those UCRs than they're doing in Balder, it leads to frustration that they should get out of the way and let people who are exclusively - or at least primarily - involved in Balder take the reins. And people can start to feel like it's a bit malicious when some of the same people are in the legislature over and over again, rotating the office of Statsminister between them. So there is a lot of frustration about Balder, and when frustration grows it can be hard for reasonable conversations to happen.
For what it's worth, there are natives of Balder who complain about it, and especially people who were once in Balder and have since moved on to other regions. There is a feeling among some that if they speak out about their dissatisfaction with Balder they will be pushed out. That has happened before, with Ikania and others.

HEM:

I mean, I think it's a fine line? Because people can have dual citizenship, and the natural state of gameplay is for people to join multiple regions and get involved. Indeed, it seems to me that that's true in this age of Discord more than ever. From my perspective, it seems like some are being selectively outraged about this in regards to Balder in part because of personal unpopularity of the players involved.

Cormac:

There could be a bit of that going on. There is also some resentment on the part of longtime players who were once targeted by people like Onder and NES for being involved elsewhere and being "insufficiently loyal." For example, NES was one of the people who helped drive that narrative about the UDL in TNP back in 2013. So there has always been this pushback against cosmopolitanism in the GCRs, and sometimes that has been driven by people in the independent and imperialist sphere. So I think now there's a bit of payback going on. People who have been targeted with questions and insinuations about their loyalties are returning that in kind now that Balder's leadership is comprised of so many people prominent in UCRs.

HEM:

Yeah, that's why I find the whole situation really difficult to resolve, but ultimately so long as Balder is a democracy it's really tough to argue that the region isn't pursuing the destiny it wants. That's where I usually settle it in my mind, at least.

Cormac:

I think it would be very helpful if their democracy was more open. Not to the outside world, to the people in Balder. It would improve perceptions a lot, I think. But that is ultimately something they'll have to decide for themselves, at least until some external force causes change, if that ever happens.

HEM:

Yeah, I mean I'm not an expert on Balder's government but I know there are elections and the people keep returning the same folks to government. Unless there's like a wide range of people disenfranchised from citizenship or voting, I'm not sure how an unpopular cabal is staying in power :p

Cormac:

Well, I think certain things can discourage participation. The Statsminister being elected only by the very small legislature, the same people running for and being elected to the legislature, etc. It's true voters are choosing them, but one wonders how many more voters there might be, and how much more participation there might be, with a system more open to participation. Even Europeia's system is more open, despite having an elected legislature as well. So it need not mean getting rid of the elected legislature, but more could be done to encourage participation, in my view.

HEM:

Fair enough, fair enough.

Cormac:

But, as I said, I think ultimately that's going to be up to Balder. As much as some may wish to see change through other means, it's probably not going to happen any way but internally through their own processes.

HEM:

I know I've brought up my feeling that "personal unpopularity" rather than strategic decisions or ideology is driving a lot of gameplay today. Would you agree with that, or push back?

Cormac:

I agree that has a lot to do with it. I think the new emphasis on socializing that we talked about earlier has a lot to do with it. I also think it has a lot to do with the staleness of gameplay. In many cases the ideologies are the same, the decisions made are unsurprising, the blocs that form are exactly what one would predict. That leads to boredom, and boredom leads to more interpersonal conflict, and more of gameplay being based on popularity and unpopularity. We need something to breathe new life into gameplay. I really feel that needs to be top-down technical change, but that's unlikely, so another idea I've had is to focus more on the World Assembly, including the General Assembly, as I briefly touched on earlier. I think that could lead to more interest in real gameplay again, and start moving us away from popularity and interpersonal conflict.

HEM:

Phew, okay well this has been really interesting. I'm going to end with a softball (for me!!) that I'm going to ask all participants of this interview series.

What is one piece of advice you would give us Europeians on improving our region?

AND

What is one piece of advice you'd give a new player in general who just joined the game and is looking at getting involved in gameplay?

Cormac:

My advice is to really shake things up! I know you've been having a debate lately about reform, and while I don't know all the details of what you're considering, I think drastic reform is exactly what Europeia needs - and what most regions need. Things have become too stale and predictable. We need to liven things up with changes that will bring people's interest back to gameplay, and make people who are bored with the game think maybe there's something new here instead of just the same old, same old. I think major reforms will not only help Europeia, but by helping Europeia and getting it focused more on gameplay again, help gameplay overall.

My advice for a new player is not to be timid. This is supposed to be a game, and people should play it like a game. Don't be afraid to have fun with it because that's what we're supposed to be doing here. And if you're not having fun doing what you're doing, do something else! Don't be discouraged by people telling you that you can't or shouldn't. As long as it's within the bounds of OOC rules and whatnot, go for it. You decide how you play the game.

HEM:

Love it! Thanks for your time Cormac, and I'm sure we'll be sniping at each other in the NSGP forum v soon

Cormac:
Probably! Thanks for interviewing me, it's been fun.[/hr][/hr][/hr]

Print this item

  IDU Football Championship 2018 (Results Thread)
Posted by: Laeral - 11-20-2018, 01:10 AM - Forum: Football Championship - Replies (43)

Following the 2008 IDU Football Championships, the idea of an international football competition laid dormant. Now, in the interests of promoting peaceful international athletic competition and strengthening the bonds of friendship between nations, the IDUFC has been revived. This annual competition will determine the best football team in the IDU.

All matches will be played in Laeral. Matches will be played at the following locations:
Group A: Parc de Noblesse, Loiraine (53,000); Stade Nationale de Lyrene, Bethune (47,000)
Group B: Stade Cenefort, Cenefort (52,000); Songshan Athletic Arena, Meilinis (41,000)
Group C: Stade International Laeralien, Laeralsford (76,000); Hanshui Stadium, Nanhai(58,000)
Group D: Laeralsford Sporting Center, Laeralsford (55,000); Parc de Auvergne, Cote d'Argent (43,000)

All matches involving the Laeralian national team taking place at the Stade International Laeralien. In all other groups, the location of each match is determined by the Laeralian Ministry of Culture. The quarterfinals will take place at the first stadium listed for each group, while the semi-finals will be at Laeralsford Sporting Center and the Parc de Noblesse, while the final will be at the Stade International Laeralien.

The 16 eligible teams have randomly been assigned to groups as follows:
Group A: Bonalando, Lauchenoiria, Legionas, United New England
Group B: Lumeau, Slokais Islands, Shuell, The Dezreik
Group C: Conternia, Gnejs, Laeral, Verwood
Group D: Gonhog, Libertas Omnium Maximus, New Lusitania, Trive

Laeral will reimburse transit and housing costs for all athletes. Ticket sales are allocated through a lottery system, with 20% of seats reserved for Laeralites, and greater preference given for those wishing to see the team of their home nation.

Each team will play each of the teams in it's group once. The two teams in each group that do best based on points (3 points for a win, 1 for a tie, 0 for a loss) will move on to the quarter-finals. The quarter-finals, and all subsequent matches, will be single-elimination, with penalties used to resolved draws. The winner of the IDUFC Final will be awarded the IDU Cup, as well as the right of first refusal for next year's IDUFC.

Print this item

  The 2018 Film Festival: Entries
Posted by: Lauchenoiria - 11-17-2018, 09:47 PM - Forum: Film Festivals - Replies (12)

IDU Film Festival 2018

Categories

Best New IDU Film:
- Entries must be films made within an IDU nation and not released outside their nation of origin more than one year ago.
- Entry should consist of a plot synopsis, language(s) spoken, list of main characters & actors, any relevant production or background information.

Best IDU Classic Film:
- Entries must be films made within an IDU nation and released more than four years ago.
- Entry should consist of a plot synopsis, language(s) spoken, list of main characters & actors, information on why the film is considered a classic.

Best Actor in an IDU Film:
- Entries must be actors/actresses of any sapient species who has appeared in a film produced within an IDU nation in the last eight years.
- Entry should consist of details about the actor/actress and must cite a specific film they have appeared in.

Best Documentary/Non-Fiction Film (new this year):
- Entries must be non-fiction films made within an IDU nation within the last four years.
- Entry should consist of a synopsis of the film, language(s) spoken, any relevant production & background details.

Best Foreign Film:
- Entries must be films produced outside of the IDU, not released outside its nation of origin more than two years ago.
- Entry post should consist of a plot synopsis, language(s) spoken, list of main characters & actors, any relevant production & background details.

Judging

Every nation that has sent any entries to any category is entitled to cast one vote for each category. The nation has free choice over how to determine their vote. The exhibitors of independently submitted films are not entitled to vote.

The judges’ decisions are final.

OOC: you may enter films using puppets, however voting is restricted to one vote per player.

Prizes

The winner of each category shall receive a golden butterfly statue and a certificate detailing the award, as well as the opportunities that come from the prestige of winning. The travel costs of the exhibitors of winning entries will be reimbursed, within reason.

The nation that wins the Best New IDU Film category will have the honour of hosting next year’s film festival in 2019. In the event of a tie, it is the responsibility of those governments to decide who has this honour.

Venue

The festival will take place in Buttercity, which is the capital of Lauchenoiria, situated in the north-east of the country. Films will be shown in a variety of cinemas across the city, and transport will be provided between venues if required.

Films may be entered by national agencies or independently (however, independent films will be vetted and their exhibitors are not entitled to vote).

Accommodation will be provided in the Butterfly Hotel, situated in the centre of the city, for all official exhibitors and judges, and for up to one other person accompanying each of these individuals. Further guests can be accommodated, but this will incur an additional fee. Any additional accommodation requirements should be specified at the time of booking.

Cars will be provided upon request, and guests will also be provided with a pass allowing unlimited travel on the city’s extensive public transport network throughout their stay. Guests are invited to make full use of this for sightseeing throughout their stay.

Each nation entering a film in any category is entitled to bring eight exhibitors or judges, plus an additional four individuals for each additional entry.

Further Information

The start date for posting entries is Monday 19th November 2018. The closing date for entries is Monday 3rd December 2018. Deadline extended until 10th December.

Voting will take place from the 4th December 2018 until the 12th December 2018. for two weeks after the close of entries.

If you have any further questions, please get in touch. Entries should be posted in this thread from Monday onwards.

Print this item

  A new dawn for Hespia
Posted by: Nova - 11-11-2018, 02:27 PM - Forum: International Affairs - No Replies

[floatright]21 Brumaire CCXXVII[/floatright]

[Image: SfptLvb.png]

From: Monsieur le Président de la République Illyséenne François R. H. Autun
To: Monsieur le Président des Provinces Alliées de Lærèle Nicholas Brennan

Salutations,

In this particular commemorative day, heavy in history as our nations remember the sacrifice made and the blood spilled, I am using of my feather to write to your Government a hope. The hope of establishing foundations that shall serve our respective people’s interests in the coming decades.

This hope is to concretise itself by the extension of an invitation to Cœur, the capital of our Republic, to your Excellence Monsieur le Président de la République. It is my will to engage a dialogue with you at your earliest convenience while enjoying the smooth climate of our country in this autumn. Our respective Republics have lacked proper diplomatic engagements with one another, and I remain confident that this invitation for you, your Excellency, is to set a new basis for the future of geopolitics in our dear continent.

Culture is something that ties us to one another, and if you were to accept my invitation, I shall be more then inclined to make this matter a key and central element for the outcome of a text, making rely our nations to one another. In an always moving World, it is my trust to affirm through dialogue cordial, and even if possible, friendly relations by partnering ourselves to face adversity to make the Grande Guerre a terrible souvenir no citizen would dare to recall with nostalgia, but rather humility and as a lesson for our nations. No winners come out from such delicate and atrocious situation in which the Grande Guerre took place. Only losers that in addition to both physical and sentimental loses, have their pride and moral stripped away.

Your Excellency may be thinking of my person extravagating, but it is unfortunately with little actions miscarried, inaction and inattention that such thing reproduce themselves, and of this, I shall not tolerate. Tying our nations even more by reinforcing our cultural similarities, and pushing our youngest generations to know one another in fraternity, is as I mentioned earlier my program with your Excellency. If our talks were to be fruitful, I would be more then prone to expand towards economic and scientific cooperation and development if that was to be your will too.

Given my most symbolic power, even if decisive when meeting with Le Conseil, I shall be assisted in our meeting with Monsieur le Ministre des Affaires Diplomatiques et Commerciales Richard which have full authority over foreign affairs. I hope it’ll ease our talks and allow us to be most concrete when coming to actions and decisions.

I am looking forward to your response,
With my most sincere regards and respects,
[floatright]- Monsieur le Président François R. H. Autun[/floatright]

Print this item

  La Gazette du Cœur
Posted by: Nova - 11-11-2018, 02:03 AM - Forum: IDU Newswire - Replies (2)

[Image: f8Rlrz4.png]

Created in 1789 to protest against the nobility following the first press release made by reformist pro-Constitutionalist (in favour of a Constitutional Monarchy) Jean Dumoulin published “La Gazette du Cœur”, meaning “The Heart’s Gazette”, through a public declaration saying his trust, love and passion for the future of nation (a concept which did not seriously existed at the time). The name “Heart”, “Cœur” in Ilysan, that Jean Dumoulin published on the header, signing and sealing his press release with, would inspire for the name of the “Perfect Republican City” that would be built following the Revolution.

With 1 250 000 printed versions daily, as digital press is having a tough time in Ilys, La Gazette as it’s its nickname, is considered as the first Ilysan media both in terms of audience and popularity, as its news are trusted and the redaction of La Gazette maintains a Radical Republican position and speech through its writings.

Due to its position as the heart of Ilysan media universe, very early following the revolution, the newspaper like 14 others from various political aspirations and visions were subsidised by the Republic with no possibility of regards by the Republic’s Officials to prevent any possible corruption or threat against the redactions. The subsidies are managed by the Ministère des Affaires Éducatives et Scientifiques as it have a great educational impact on the child, and allows an easier introduction to active-life for those choosing journalism-studies, given that the Republic fully pay all bills for education until the age of 25.

Print this item

  Truth & Reconciliation Commission
Posted by: Sanctaria - 11-10-2018, 05:30 PM - Forum: Planners' Office - Replies (30)

This will be starting soon. We will just RP in real-time and then when the RP is finished, we'll go back and say "this happened on X date" etc - the reason for this is we're all a little busy, and the holiday period is coming up, so we can't all commit to posting what I imagine will be quite lengthy pieces on X day at X time, and expect nations to respond (again with quite possibly lengthy pieces) before that day is out.

It'll be done in 2 phases.

First, we will address crimes done in the war. Secondly, we will discuss reparations.

In the first phase, the judge will call on each country (or in the case of Lauchenoiria, the interim-government) to present before her each grievance they have against specific persons or people. The judge will do this one at a time. So, for example, when the judge calls on the interim-gov, they might say Charissa Clarke, the Chaher family, reps of Gonhog govt, reps of Kerlile govt etc etc.

Once all the grievances are done, the judge will then collate them (for where a person/entity has been accused of a grievance by more than one country), and will assign a running order of when they will be heard. Then per case, she will hear prosecutory arguments, and then defence arguments.

For the sake of ease, there'll be no jumping in and rebuttal statements allowed. Think of it as the opening and closing prosecution and defence arguments rolled into one.

In the second phase, we'll do the same, but instead will be applications for reparations (i.e. costs etc) - so the interim government of Lauchenoria might say Conternias owes them X amount for y. Again, judge will hear arguments in favour, and then arguments not in favour.

After those two phases are done, the judge will pronounce her verdicts.

Any questions?

Print this item

  The North Star - Issue I
Posted by: Tlomz - 10-26-2018, 07:20 PM - Forum: Embassy of The North Pacific - Replies (1)

[Image: MYKFESC.png]

[/hr][Image: sG8YGQy.png] Editor's Note
by El Fiji Grande, Minister of Communications

Good day, all! I'd like to take a minute to introduce you to The North Pacific's latest publication: The North Star. It will be published once monthly, offset from the Northern Lights by a two week period. The North Star will include Election Results, the NPA Bulletin, Regional Assembly Highlights, and the WA Digest. While The Northern Lights will continue to serve as our region's premiere newspaper, The North Star will take on the role of a standard update. Thanks for your time, and I hope you enjoy this issue!

Signed,
[Image: aXH4VVr.png]

[/hr][Image: sG8YGQy.png] September 2018 General Elections
by Hardonius, Staff Member of the Ministry of Communications

The September 2018 elections were a spectacular event, anticipated by many for months and offset by the change of forums. However, after a long wait, the elections finally got underway and ended the 14th.

In an unprecedented turn of events, the Delegate and Vice Delegate elections were only filled by one candidate for each on the ballot. Siwale, the incumbent Delegate, took a total of 49 votes and 4 abstains, claiming his second term in office. As for the Vice Delegate election, Pallaith, the incumbent Vice Delegate, took a total of 46 votes and 7 abstains, claiming another term in office.

Taking a look to our Regional Assembly, the Speaker elections were an interesting area to view, with both candidates putting strong campaigns forward. Incumbent Deputy Speaker Wonderess took a victory with 28 votes, gaining 58% of the votes, taking a term in the Speakership. Their opponent, bootsie, took the other 42% with 20 votes.

In a close victory, Crushing Our Enemies is the new Attorney General, taking 26 votes, for 54% of the votes. Incumbent Attorney General Goyanes took 46% of the votes, for a total of 22 votes. It was a close and harrowing election, but the former Chief Justice and Speaker took the majority and took office the same day.

We would like to congratulate all of our newly elected officials, wish luck to those who ran this election, and thank all of our voters for furthering our democracy.

[/hr][Image: sG8YGQy.png] North Pacific Army Bulletin Sept-Oct 2018
By Dinoium, Deputy Minister of Communications and Deputy Attorney General

[Image: thenorthpacific1113581540150115.png]
Minister of Defense: Zazumo

Deputy Minister of Defense: Veniyerris, Konar
_____________________________________
This once again was a great couple of months during the term. Former Lieutenant and NPA Officer Goyanes returned after losing the Attorney General Election with the rank of Lieutenant again. Two people joined us within this period: ABC and Palutenia.
We also got two new Officer Tests done! Dinoium and Huks Gares! Huks Gares is a former Lieutenant who rejoined as well like Goyanes at the rank of Sergeant.

Promotions:
[Image: 4k6typm.png] Dinoium promoted to Lieutenant! (8/24/18)
[Image: 4k6typm.png] [B]Huk Gares promoted to Lieutenant! (8/29/18)
[Image: aDjWVNR.png] [B] Paluentia promoted to Private First Class! (10/13/18)
_____________________________________
Logs of the period:

To end this off, we will be continuing our Featured Troop of the Report. Congratulations Palutenia!
[/B][/B]

[/hr][Image: sG8YGQy.png] Regional Assembly Highlights
by Hardonius, Staff Member of the Ministry of Communications

Passed: Election Commission Confirmation of BMWSurfer:
Introduced by Siwale via appointment, the Regional Assembly undertook a four day vote to confirm BMWSurfer to the Election Commission for the September 2018 elections. BMWSurfer was confirmed to the Commission by a vote 18 “Aye”, 1 “Nay”, and 1 abstain.

Passed: The Unicorn Star Accord:
Introduced by Siwale, this proposal sought to bilaterally further unite and bring together The North Pacific and The Rejected Realms, both being game-created regions. Through this proposal, both regions established diplomatic recognition of each other, while pushing forth an agenda of non-aggression and cooperation in world affairs.

Awaiting Quorum: Amendment to the Election and Appointment Procedure:
Introduced by BluieGamer, this proposal pushed to extend the current term of the incumbent government due to the state of recess caused by the transfer to Tapatalk. Through this proposal, the current government would serve for one more month before transferring to the next election cycle. It also pushed for the change of election months, pushing them forward by one month.

[/hr][Image: sG8YGQy.png] World Assembly Digest
by El Fiji Grande, Minister of Communications

Over the course of the last month and a half, The North Pacific has been - and continues to undergo - a forum emergency. During this period, our Executive Ministries were not as active as is usual, and as such, the coming issue of The Northern Lights was delayed by a month. As such, this WA Digest encompasses about half of October and all of September. [h][/h]

[Image: ga.jpg]
General Assembly
Improving the world one resolution at a time.

[/hr]
Repeal "Crime and Punishment"
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 11,284 Against: 3,827
Final Vote (TNP): For: 395 Against: 125 Percentage of WA nations voting: 36.7%

Recommendation: United Massachusetts proposed this repeal as the first step towards replacing it with a resolution to ban capital punishment, which would conflict with the currently standing resolution. UM highlights the irreversible effect that capital punishment inflicts, the loss of life. We concur with this and also raise the point that in the event of an error found later on, posthumous acquittals are only symbolic in nature, as they do not change the fact that the state executed an innocent. We believe that all persons have the right to live, and we believe this proposal is a step in the right direction.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote for the resolution.

[/hr]
Uniform Labeling Of Hazardous Goods
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 14,184 Against: 1,108
Final Vote (TNP): For: 515 Against: 23 Percentage of WA nations voting: 38.1%

Recommendation: The resolution proposes the labeling of hazardous materials in an effort to prevent undue loss of life and reduce inconsistencies of labeling systems between nations. In doing so, it commissions the International Transport Safety Committee (ITSC) with creating a universal labeling system and set of standards to achieve aforementioned goals. Such legislation is deemed to be an integral and necessary step in ensuring the safety of workers and the greater WA citizens alike. In accordance with these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote For the resolution.

[/hr]
Freedom Of Expression For Organizations
Status: Failed
Delegate's Vote: Against
Final Vote (World): For: 3,108 Against: 11,770
Final Vote (TNP): For: 115 Against: 401 Percentage of WA nations voting: 36.5%

Recommendation: Affirming that the importance of freedom of speech is paramount, we are disappointed in the stark lack of depth and confusing delivery that leaves us questioning the potential effectiveness of this proposal. This proposal intends to set free speech standards for organizations, however picks seemingly arbitrary points on which to base these standards. Noting the complexities of organizations and how they deal with free speech, especially in the vastly diverse members of this World Assembly, it becomes our belief at this time that these freedoms, or lack there of, are better handled by national governments and and not be regulated by the General Assembly at large.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote against the resolution.

[/hr]
Administrative Compliance Act
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 11,084 Against: 4,011
Final Vote (TNP): For: 429 Against: 86 Percentage of WA nations voting: 36.9%

Recommendation: The Administrative Compliance Act targets the frustrating behavior of noncompliance within the World Assembly. While it is a complicated law, it is also beneficial.

Firstly, the ACA creates a committee that applies hefty fines to any nation that does not comply, within arguable interpretations, with WA resolutions. The payment of these fines will then be used to benefit compliant WA nations.This means that any nation that acts in conformity with WA law will be rewarded for their compliance!

Secondly, the ACA requires members engage in stiff economic and political sanctions for any nation that refuses to pay said fines. This empowers individual nations to act directly to punish genocide, torture, rampant discrimination, and slavery in nations which commit those foul acts.

Lastly, the ACA gives individual persons the right to sue in their nation's courts if that nation refuses to address their grievance, creating both an incentive for participation and a means of reparation.

This proposal, when taken in full, curtails noncompliance in its worst forms. This will not only benefit the greater citizens on the WA as a whole but improve quality of life for those in non-compliant nations.

Refusing to allow non-compliant nations to oppress people further and in accordance with above, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote For this proposal.

[/hr]
Convention on Freshwater Shortages
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 12,864 Against: 2,161
Final Vote (TNP): For: 452 Against: 34 Percentage of WA nations voting: 35.3%

Recommendation: Convention on Freshwater Shortages establishes a basic mission to preserve an ample supply of clean drinking water and prevent the loss of essential waterways to pollution. The operative clauses are mostly advisory and encouraging, leaving the details to individual nations and justifying its mild strength. However, this is a framework that works and is appropriate for the World Assembly, setting its goals for the future.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote for the resolution.

[/hr]
Repeal: "On Universal Jurisdiction"
Status: Discarded
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 12,234 Against: 2,543
Final Vote (TNP): For: 442 Against: 40 Percentage of WA nations voting: 34.9%

Recommendation: Convention on Freshwater Shortages establishes a basic mission to preserve an ample supply of clean drinking water and prevent the loss of essential waterways to pollution. The operative clauses are mostly advisory and encouraging, leaving the details to individual nations and justifying its mild strength. However, this is a framework that works and is appropriate for the World Assembly, setting its goals for the future.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote for the resolution.

[/hr]
Circulation of World Assembly Law
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 12,053 Against: 2,588
Final Vote (TNP): For: 437 Against: 65 Percentage of WA nations voting: 36.3%

Recommendation: The proposal is designed to improve the dissemination of information relating to World Assembly legislation, and ushers the development of a WA service branch to work with member nations in carrying out that task.

The only mandatory clauses to be followed by members are to make WA resolution texts available (not require forceful dissemination of them) and to not interfere with the Law Dissemination Service's work by deliberately discriminating against its employees.

The remainder of the resolution, specifically clauses 2 and 3 are optional, as their enacting clauses are "Urges" and "Recommends", respectively. Clauses 2 and 3 request that additional emphasis on WA law be entered into the education system and that member states make strident efforts to ensure the widest possible understanding and appreciation of both rights and obligations, among citizens. This to improve compliance among WA nations; but, also to ensure that the public has the ability to govern up, and ensure their nation is meeting its obligations to the Assembly, and the international community. However, as stated before this is technically optional, though highly encouraged.

The Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote for the resolution.

[/hr]
Ban on Capital Punishment
Status: Failed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 7,903 Against: 10,163
Final Vote (TNP): For: 262 Against: 343 Percentage of WA nations voting: 43.2%

Recommendation: This proposal seeks to fully ban all forms of capital punishment, better known as the death penalty, across WA nations. The death penalty has proven to be an ineffective method of punishment for criminals, often having little to no effect on crime rates after being implemented. Noting that the death penalty cannot be reversed, innocent people may die due to judicial error and new evidence coming to light.

In seeking to promote human rights and for these reasons mentioned above, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs of The North Pacific recommends a vote for the proposal.

[/hr]
Preventing the Execution of Innocents
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 9,244 Against: 8,475
Final Vote (TNP): For: 341 Against: 242 Percentage of WA nations voting: 40.8%
No Recommendation

[/hr]
Int'l Service of Process
Status: Failed
Delegate's Vote: Against
Insufficient information

[/hr]
Convention on International Oil Spills
Status: Repealed
Delegate's Vote: Against
Final Vote (World): For: 12,810 Against: 4,372
Final Vote (TNP): For: 376 Against: 200 Percentage of WA nations voting: 40.5%

Recommendation: This proposal attempts to create a unified approach to the prevention and clean up of oil spills; however, the Ministry has identified some significant problems with the document, not the least of which is the poor quality of the writing and grammar. This is attributable to it being rushed through the drafting process, and a failure by the author to allow proper vetting of a document that aspires to become law. This leaves the proposal vulnerable to repeal.

In some instances, the proposal is extremely vague and informal, exemplified by the suggested timeline for maintenance of oil tanks. In other cases, the proposal is needlessly specific on matters previously addressed in existing law (specifically GA95). This creates the potential for redundancy and conflict, and could also lead to repeal.

Finally, the Ministry is concerned that a good portion of the onus for the prevention and clean up of such spills would be shifted to the WA instead of remaining on oil companies, where it belongs. While the Ministry acknowledges the importance of the subject, and feels it is an area worthy of legislation, the consensus is that this proposal fails to meet the standards of the Assembly.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote against the resolution.

[/hr]
Greenhouse Gas Cap and Trade Program
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For?
Final Vote (World): For: 13,741 Against: 2,606
Final Vote (TNP): For: 483 Against: 93 Percentage of WA nations voting: 40.6%
No Recommendation

[/hr]
Repeal "Convention on International Oil Spills"
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 13,189 Against: 3,151
Final Vote (TNP): For: 513 Against: 57 Percentage of WA nations voting: 39.8%

Recommendation: As exemplified in the original IFV sent, the target resolution commits improper and unprofessional grammar mistakes, uses unclear and vague language, and possesses a general feel of rushed authorship. This repeal properly addresses and presents these points before the General Assembly as well as meets the goal of repealing the resolution.

Therefore the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs, in accordance with such facts presented above, recommends a vote FOR this repeal.

[/hr]
Respondeat Superior
Status: At Vote
Delegate's Vote: Against

Recommendation: The proposal before us would allow individuals to sue companies for acts of negligence committed by employees against individuals. We believe this to be a well-intentioned proposal, however we feel it is too vague to cover the issue at hand. The proposal appears to be vague/under developed which concerns may lead to a repeal which would further harm the chances of positive tort reform coming into effect.

In hopes of a redraft and subsequent resubmit, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote Against the proposal.[h][/h]

[Image: sc.jpg]
Security Council
Spreading interregional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.


[/hr]
Commend Greater Dienstad
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 13,689 Against: 1,317
Final Vote (TNP): For: 467 Against: 34 Percentage of WA nations voting: 32.3%

Recommendation: Greater Dienstad is a stalwart of the NationStates roleplay community, fostering exceptional roleplay collaborations with various regions and hosting a variety of events, including our own 'The North Pacific-Greater Dienstad Roleplay and Cultural Exchange' held recently. Seeing the proposed commendation as a well deserved reward for Greater Dienstad's years of activity and service in the community, we urge you to vote for Commend Greater Dienstad.

[/hr]
Commend Frattastan II
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For?
Final Vote (World): For: 12,188 Against: 2,408
Final Vote (TNP): For: 427 Against: 38 Percentage of WA nations voting: 33.8%
No Recommendation

[/hr]
Liberate Confederation Of Corrupt Dictators
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: Against
Final Vote (World): For: 10,443 Against: 4,928
Final Vote (TNP): For: 316 Against: 196 Percentage of WA nations voting: 35.9%

Recommendation: This self-pat-on-the-back proposal is nothing more than a publicity stunt to bring attention to their region after recently starting a campaign of antagonism against the World Assembly. This region is near totally undeserving of any positive recognition from the greater WA community; particularly in that the proposal's arguments for said commendation hold no merit and the regions intent to undermine experienced and intelligent voices within the WA.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote against the resolution.

[/hr]
Repeal: "Liberate The Communal Confederacy"
Status: Passed
Delegate's Vote: For
Final Vote (World): For: 13,750 Against: 789
Final Vote (TNP): For: 435 Against: 34 Percentage of WA nations voting: (40.0)%

Recommendation: Barring any reason to maintain a liberation for symbolic purposes, once a region has been refounded and has an active founder nation, there is no need to maintain a liberation. Liberations only remove delegate-imposed passwords, not founder-imposed passwords. Since The Communal Confederacy has a founder, the liberation serves no further purpose.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote for the resolution.

[/hr]
Condemn Lord Dominator
Status: Failed
Delegate's Vote: Against
Final Vote (World): For: 7,987 Against: 8,748
Final Vote (TNP): For: 193 Against: 351 Percentage of WA nations voting: 38.4%

Recommendation: This proposal to condemn Lord Dominator is entirely undeserved. Its only purpose is to fulfill a desire to retaliate for the liberation that targeted the home region of this proposal's author, who also founded the region. Regardless of one's feelings about the use of liberations as an offensive tool, this presents a clear conflict of interest, is clearly an inappropriate use of the Security Council, and is not worth being entertained.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote against the resolution.

[/hr]
Liberate Federation Of Conservative Nations
Status: Failed
Delegate's Vote: Against
Final Vote (World): For: 3,892 Against: 12,243
Final Vote (TNP): For: 59 Against: 482 Percentage of WA nations voting: 38.4%

Recommendation: The liberation of the Federation of Conservative Nations is an unneeded liberation that would be much better served as a condemnation. Let it be known that racism in any form is toxic and should be condemned and ousted. However when confined to such a small regional discord, a liberation seems unnecessary to fight such transgression.

In believing that the application of a condemnation would be much better served and in accordance with reasons stated above, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote against this proposal.

[/hr]
Condemn Chan Island
Status: At Vote
Delegate's Vote: For

Recommendation: In acknowledging that some issues that come before our nations may be brought about by bad actors within the world assembly, we must recognize the primary abettor of this chaos and mayhem. Chan Island, formerly Annihilators of Chan Island, has contributed to at least 24 different situations that nations may encounter; in which your desired answer to these issues may not have the impact you had hoped for. To compound the villainy, Chan Island has also given direct assistance to occupiers and hostile invaders of various regions, some of which had to be valiantly liberated and fought for control of by those wishing to restore them.

Understanding that Chan Island only wants to watch the world burn despite his lack of predatory superweapon usage, and in accordance with the reasons stated above, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote For this proposal.
[/hr]
[small]The North Star: Lighting The Way To The Truth
Publisher: Siwale :: Executive Editor: El Fiji Grande :: Managing Editors: Dinoium, Ryasta, Bobberino

The North Star is produced by the Ministry of Communications on behalf of the Government of The North Pacific and is distributed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs externally and the Ministry of Home Affairs internally. Except where otherwise indicated, all content represents the views of the Government of The North Pacific.[/small]

[/hr]
[/hr]

Print this item

  Bonalandan Institute of International Collaboration (Phosphorescent Pebbles)
Posted by: Bonalando - 09-17-2018, 10:05 AM - Forum: International Affairs - Replies (4)

Dear Nation of the IDU,

With blessings of the Bonalandan Executive Council, I, Marja Brito (Head of the Department for Scientific Research and Dissemination), invite you to contribute in the investigation into the phosphorescent pebbles, or 'Glowstones' of Diamant.

The Bonalandan Council has allocated a reasonable budget to this research. On top of our own basic direct funding into the research we are willing to make further investment matching that brought to the project by other nations up to a cap of 1 million Moneros per nation to be shared with the international research project for services provided.

We invite applications from prospective contributing researchers from your great nations. Please encourage your researchers to apply with a brief covering letter outlining their specialism and background and where appropriate the facilities that your nation will be making available to the project.

In the spirit of international collaboration that Bonalando strives to promote, all participants should remember that all research findings will be available to all participating nations through their involved parties but will also be available to the wider international community.

Print this item

  Bonalandan Institute of International Collaboration (various RP planning)
Posted by: Bonalando - 09-17-2018, 09:01 AM - Forum: Planners' Office - Replies (11)

This thread will be used for OOC planning and idea sharing for any RPs relating to international projects in which Bonalando is pivotal.

General idea is to help everyone know how best to be involved while maintaining consistency within IC thread.

In the spirit of open play I'd like RPs to be pretty open, however I think it worth using this thread as a place for those keen on contributing to establish how they intend to contribute. This should help to reduce undesirable bumps and unnecessary awkwardness in the RPs.

Print this item