Thread Closed

PASSED: Orbital Space Safety Act
#1

Orbital Safety Act

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.

Category: Environmental
Industries Affected: All Businesses
Proposed by: Witchcliff

Description
Noting the enlarging amount of obsolete satellites, space vehicles, spent rocket casing and other debris currently in orbit around inhabited planets for reasons including, but not limited to, various nations space races, orbiting weapons platforms, exploration of space, deliberate dumping of junk into orbit and visiting space faring nations jettisoning their refuse.

Further noting this debris presents a danger to all nations, whether they use orbital space or not, and worried about the possible loss of life and/or property that could occur when some of this junk survives re-entry, and crashes onto the planet, or collides with working equipment in orbit, manned or unmanned.

Convinced measures to clean up this orbital space debris are necessary to protect life and property of all nations. This will work to promote international co-operation between nations of all technological levels, reduce the economic impact caused by nations losing working equipment to collisions with space junk, and ensure orbital space can be utilized by all in as safe and equal a manner as possible.

Mandates:

1 ? All UN nations are responsible for any form of equipment put into orbital space by that nation. This includes anything launched by government and/or private agencies. Nations that use another nation?s facilities for launch purposes are still ultimately responsible for their own equipment.

2 - All UN nations with equipment in orbital space must be able to identify any equipment launched from or by their nation, whether by government or private agencies, and must immediately accept responsibility for any piece of their equipment that poses a danger, at the time it is identified as a danger.

3 ? All nations with equipment in orbital space must take immediate proactive measures to repair, retrieve or destroy safely any piece of their equipment that is identified as space junk and identified as posing a danger to their own and/or other nation?s people or property. Nations may delegate direct and/or financial responsibility for dealing with said equipment down to private agencies within that nation at their own discretion.

4 ? Nations that have equipment in orbital space are responsible for any and all costs incurred in dealing with their own space debris. If you can afford to build it and put it up there, you can afford the clean up.

Strongly encourages all nations with equipment in orbital space to co-operate with each other and share information and technology both to reduce the amount of space debris currently in orbit, and to improve methods of repair, retrieval or safe destruction of malfunctioning equipment in the future.

Urges all UN nations to work together to clean up unidentifiable and/or small space debris currently in orbital space, as much as they are technologically and/or financially able to assist, to ensure a cleaner, safer, environment for those nations with equipment and/or personnel in that environment, to reduce the possibility of objects damaging working equipment, and to reduce the danger of large pieces of debris falling back to the planet.

Encourages space faring nations to offer their services to assist with the disposal of orbital space debris. Payments and terms of contracts for these jobs will be at the discretion of the nation concerned to negotiate with the customer(s).

Voting Ends: Mon Sep 4 2006
#2

For.
#3

FOR.
#4

FOR
#5

I'm waiting to hear what Mik thnks of this.
#6

GrosseschnauzerSep 1 2006, 06:04 PMI'm waiting to hear what Mik thnks of this.[/quote]
I'm curious...

I too am for.
#7

As I recall, Mik got a resolution to a floor vote in the early days of the IDU that dealt with a similar topic but it failed to garner a majority.

That's why I'd like to hear Mik's views before voting, if time permits.
#8

FOR
#9

GrosseschnauzerSep 1 2006, 11:04 AM I'm waiting to hear what Mik thnks of this. [/quote]
In many ways it is similar to the Tracking Near Earth Objects resolution my government wrote back in 2004. That resolution passed via a supermajority and carried over 300 UN Delegate endorsements, which at the time was a record.

Naturally I've voted in favour of this resolution. It is well written and strikes a delicate balance between mandated clauses which hold nations accountable for any damages caused by anything they put into orbit, but also includes voluntary clauses that promote cooperation and information sharing by all nations with respect to orbits.



Not completely related, but I finally "built" the Hauer Observatory entry:
http://ns.goobergunch.net/wiki/index.php...bservatory

If you read the entry, you'll see a reference to the fact that the observatory particpates in the Near Earth Objects Tracking program. In the Tracking Near Earth Objects resolution (link included in this article too), I've started a list of observatories and space programs that *also* participate. Even if you don't have a NSWiki article, some of you have space programs and observatories and it is very appropriate to add (voluntary of course) your programs to that list. Smile

OOC: Cernana and Schweickart were two RL Apollo astronauts, hence the names of the telescopes.
#10

Federation of DisjunctionSep 1 2006, 01:37 PM GrosseschnauzerSep 1 2006, 06:04 PMI'm waiting to hear what Mik thnks of this.[/quote]
I'm curious...

I too am for. [/quote]
Well, I've had my hand in several space related proposals. The Tracking Near Earth Objects was an International Security resolution, mimicing a sort of NASA leveled expenditure. That resolution passed and was a rewrite of the Space Defense Initiative -- I don't know if the text of that previous proposal still exists or not. Sad SDI was a resolution, but it failed (in fact, it was among the first resolutions to fail -- only a few before that went down). Tracking Near Earth Objects also incorporated some ideas from my high school Model United Nations resolution titled "Tracking and Preparation for Asteroid Collisions" (I still have a copy of this). Smile

Around the time of the founding of the IDU in 2004, there was another proposal Cheney-Land and I worked on "The Peaceful Uses of Outer Space", which was in reality a re-write of the UN Convention on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. That proposal got sacked on the grounds that many NationStates players consider themselves to be space fairing races with extensive militaries. I still want to write a Global Disarmament resolution on banning the use of Mass Drivers on Civilian Targets (planets or ships). People are more than welcome to beat me to it! Smile

There was a non-IDU space junk proposal that this resolution will discourage (though not block).
#11

Thanks.

Based on the views expressed by Mik, we will support the proposal.
#12

The region's vote will now be cast FOR this resolution.
Thread Closed


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)