Air Travel Safety Act
#1

I'm working on this on Jolt, I think it might be near submission, so here it is.

Quote: Air Travel Safety Act
Category: Free Trade/International Security/Global Disarmament/Human Rights (depending on how the draft shapes up)
Strength: Strong/Significant

Description: BELIEVING that air travel is a fast and efficient method of transportation, however

NOTING that without standards for air travel, it can also be dangerous,

1. DEFINES, for the purpose of this resolution:
a. "aircraft" as any vehicle that travels through the air, such as airplanes, airships, helicopters, blimps, hot-air- and lighter-than-air balloons, etc. and is under the command of a civilian crew without military purpose or intent;
b. "civilian aircraft" as an aircraft under the command of a civilian crew for a non-military purpose and "military aircraft" as any aircraft being used for military purposes (including civilian aircraft that have been hijacked for military purposes);
c. "airport" as anywhere designated for any type of air vehicle to take off an land;
d. "emergency situation" as a situation on an aircraft in which eminent loss of life, property or the aircraft is threatened;
e. "international flight" as a flight by a civilian aircraft that takes off in one UN nation and lands in another;

2. CREATES the UN Team for Aviation Regulations and Mandates to Avoid Catastrophic Kinds of Erratic Disasters (UNTARMACKED) to create and periodically revise standards for air transportation;

3. ASSERTS that all nations have sovereignty over their airspace, and that, in non-emergency situations, civilian aircraft must respect any regulations made by nations as long as they are in the nation in question's airspace;

4. MANDATES that, in an emergency situation on a civilian aircraft, the nearest airport to the aircraft where the aircraft could make a safe landing, as determined by the captain or other officer-in-charge of the aircraft, must allow the aircraft to land safely as soon as possible, and must allow another or the same aircraft to pick up the passengers and transport them to their final destination in a safe and timely manner;

5. CONDEMNS the attack of any civilian aircraft except when absolutely necessary and the disguising of military aircraft as civilian aircraft;

6. MANDATES that all passenger aircraft flying international flights carry safety items to adequately protect each passenger in case of cabin depressurization, water landing, rough/crash landing, and other emergency scenarios, the exact specifications of which shall be determined by UNTARMACKED and may vary with different types of aircraft;

7. DESIGNATES UNTARMACKED to develop a universal system of lights, insignia, signals, radios, and other methods of aircraft identification and communication that all aircraft flying international flights must use and that all captains, pilots and officers of such aircraft be familiar with;

8. DESIGNATES UNTARMACKED to develop a standard for minimum safe training, size of crew and safe routes of travel for different types of aircraft that all airlines must abide by for international flights;

9. DECLARES that the regulations in clauses 8 and 9 will be reviewed and revised yearly in order to account for new types of aircraft and other changing factors, and that airlines and nations may submit petitions to change regulations set by UNTARMACKED, which will be read at these yearly reviews;

9. STRONGLY URGES nations to enact similar safety policies for domestic flights.[/quote]
Reply
#2

Sorry I didn't see this before now. Where are you in the submission process? It seems pretty tight. I see you addresss attacking a civilian plane. Do you want to address any other forms of illegal interaction; i.e. highjacking? Or the misuse of a commercial plane like using a cropduster for spreading poison gas?

Maybe you don't want to get into that type of stuff. I will say that with the plane going off the runway in Kentucky this week due to pilot error and understaffing in the control tower, maybe a section on adequate safety and air traffic control personnel might be a good addition.

Nice stuff!
Reply
#3

Well, it's hit a bump in the road, which is that Fris ruled there was no category where it would be legal. So I'm now trying to push a new category through for "Standards and Protocols" or something...
Reply
#4

CeoranaSep 3 2006, 03:19 PM Well, it's hit a bump in the road, which is that Fris ruled there was no category where it would be legal. So I'm now trying to push a new category through for "Standards and Protocols" or something... [/quote]
The good news is Hack seems to like the new proposed categories, and if we can get the two of them liking the categories, I honestly am hopeful that we'll see the category before 2007 rolls around! Smile

It is a good proposal, but they've made me break things up to fit into existing categories. Indirectly Fris is just giving you the chance to keep everything in one piece.
Reply
#5

Yeah, I figure I'll probably just work on something else for a while, and if and when the new category comes out I'll bring it back to the front burner.
Reply
#6

CeoranaSep 3 2006, 08:03 PM Yeah, I figure I'll probably just work on something else for a while, and if and when the new category comes out I'll bring it back to the front burner. [/quote]
Well, if you are looking for ideas, I've always felt the UN should have a volunteer based elections monitors program. Basically it *would* be yet another UN Committee, but the way it would work is nations volunteer elections monitors (individuals) whom the committee assigns to monitor elections in nations that request the free service, and after the election the UN writes a report on how fair the elections were and what could be done next time to streamline the process.

There may be a RL example that could be used as a model.

The advantage in this is it is a clear no brainer that this would be a Furtherment of Democracy resolution -- something appropriate for the IDU. Wink
Reply
#7

Wasn't St Edmund already working on that in his "Assistance to Democracy" draft?

But I do think a group effort on an FoD proposal would be very nice. I'm looking through newspapers for inspiration...
Reply
#8

CeoranaSep 4 2006, 03:52 PM Wasn't St Edmund already working on that in his "Assistance to Democracy" draft?

But I do think a group effort on an FoD proposal would be very nice. I'm looking through newspapers for inspiration... [/quote]
Yes. It was submitted for a trial run without any TG campaign, , as 'Aid In Democratic Elections', and only got about 20-25 approvals if I remember correctly... Sad
I'd be interested (in my role as St Edmund) to see what any of you come up with along those lines, either by adapting my text or by starting afresh...
Reply
#9

I'll try working something up from scratch, so you can use it as new material to improve Aid in Democratic Elections.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)