Right to Divorce
#1

Quote: Right to Divorce

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Love and esterel

Description: The United Nations,

A ? NOTING the positive effects of marriage and the happiness it procures in both those within the marriage and those around the married.

B ? NOTING that not all marriages are happy

C ? NOTING that many couples in this case have difficulty maintaining a healthy relationship over short periods of time, let alone a life-long relationship.

D ? CONCERNED about the health and welfare of both the couple and any children the couple are responsible for

E ? ACKNOWLEDGING the potential issues that could result from a possible divorce

F ? DEFINING for the purposes of this document a divorce to be the contractual ending of any marriage or equivalent Civil Union recognized by any state

G ? DEFINING for the purposes of this document a prenuptial agreement to be any contract signed by both partners before a marriage agreeing to certain terms pertaining to their marriage and/or potential divorce.

H ? DEFINING for the purposes of this document a Civil Union to be a legal union between any two people given equal status within the union and granted certain rights by any government.


-1- DECLARES that a marriage or civil union may be ended by divorce in the following cases:
-1.1- Both partners ask for divorce, after 3 month of marriage or civil union
-1.2- One partner request a divorce and it is accepted by the other partner, after 3 month of marriage or civil union
-1.3- One partner requests the divorce due to proven domestic violence issues from the other partner
-1.4- One partner requests the divorce after 1 year of being officially separated
-1.5- One partner repeats a request for a divorce 3 months, or later, after the initial request
-1.6- Any additional scenarios that have been chosen by a more local government as grounds for divorce

-2- DECLARES that each party has the right to employ a lawyer for the divorce proceedings

-3- DECLARES that both parents have the right to continue to regularly see their children after a divorce, except for cases where the divorce was over proven domestic violence or sexual abuse, or if such actions are taken upon either the other parent or any of the shared children after the divorce has taken place

-4- PERMITS parents who have lost the right to see their children for issues listed in [3] be allowed to have this right returned if a court of law feels that said parent is no longer a threat to the child or other parent.

-5- URGES Nations to ensure that their legislation protects both partners and their children in divorce cases by granting financial help for one partner, when a fair solution, in accordance to the prenuptial agreement, can be found in order both partners and children can live with a reasonable financial situation - except in cases where the divorce was over proven domestic violence,

-6- ENCOURAGES all Nations to support organisations/associations providing help to married/divorced persons/couples by anonymous meeting, phone call, internet contact or any other medium that can be arranged

Co-authored by Forgottenlands UN

Voting Ends: Sun Dec 11 2005 [/quote]
Reply
#2

My nation isn't sure why this is an international issue. Currently we are inclined to just abstain. There is nothing wrong with the resolution, in fact, upon a quick read, it seems very well written.

However, we'd appreciate pro and con statements from your nations, and will probably be swayed by the majority vote of the region.
Reply
#3

Against, because
1) It's from LAE
2) Why should we have a UN wide law about divorce?
Reply
#4

We think it's completely pointless. AGAINST.
Reply
#5

FOR. We've got to have something to repeal. Wink
Reply
#6

If I weren't UN delegate at the moment, I'd be voting against this proposal as it is written.

It is one thing to have a proposal that protects the principle of the right to divorce, in those societies that have government sanction for legitimate marriages rather than solely religious institutions. It is an entirely different matter where the proposal contains so much detail.

This is not one of those topics where "one size fits all" and in my judgment the resolution goes too far.


I will of course, cast the region's vote in accordance with the majority's will late Saturday night, so get your votes on record before then.
Reply
#7

Quote: How should the region's vote be cast?
FOR  [ 1 ]  [25.00%]
AGAINST  [ 3 ]  [75.00%]
ABSTAIN  [ 0 ]  [0.00%][/quote]

I will cast the region's vote against the proposal.
Reply
#8

I still abstained. So the late coming vote is mine.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)