Vote: Computer Crimes Act
#1

Computer Crimes Act

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.


Category: International Security


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Gwenstefani

Description: Computer Crimes Act

NOTING the increasing trend for computer networks to be interconnected and to transcend national borders;

AWARE that the vast majority of businesses and most national and international economies rely on these systems and the information contained within;

ALERT to the dangers of allowing such a vital and grand-scale system to remain unprotected by international law; dangers which could cause massive economic, and other, damage to individuals, corporations and states alike through the damage or theft of computer systems or the information contained therein;

PROHIBITS the following practices:

1) The use, spread, and creation without proper safety precautions*, of computer viruses and other similar malicious programs including worms, Trojans, or any other program which damages, or otherwise adversely affects, computer systems; or destroys, damages, manipulates or steals information without authorisation. This excludes security specialists in their attempts to find new ways of defending against viruses, so long as they are creating and using such programs solely for that purpose, and do not use them without the authorisation of the owners of the computer system. They still may not spread them, and they must use proper safety precautions* (*to prevent spread and/or direct damage to computer systems or data in them without the express permission of the owners).

2) Computer hacking, defined as the intentional unauthorised access to, or unauthorised use, theft, manipulation or damage of information stored electronically.

3) Identity theft, defined as any unauthorised attempt to use or steal elements pertaining to another individual?s identity, including credit card details.

MANDATES that any business, organisation (either governmental or non-governmental) must take security measures to protect any confidential data contained in them, especially that data that pertains to information about their customers or members of the public. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, password protection of systems, data encryption, firewall installation, and virus scanning software, etc.

URGES all UN nations to implement security measures or legislation to protect these computer networks and the information contained on them through the promotion of, and education on, such measures, including encryption, password protection, firewalls, virus scanning software, and the use of secure operating systems, etc.

ENCOURAGES international cooperation between national law enforcement agencies, as well as the voluntary co-operation of the computer and Internet industry, in an attempt to reduce computer crime and improve the security of global computer networks and systems

ESTABLISHES the International Computer Security Institute (ICSI) whose tasks shall be to:

1) monitor international computer crime and work with law enforcement agencies to prevent it

2) promote and encourage the development of new security systems to help prevent computer crime

3) create and co-ordinate education programmes on computer crime prevention

and which shall be funded by voluntary donations by states, organisations, businesses or individuals.





Groot Gouda's position: Undecided
Reply
#2

I have supported this proposal before, however, I don't think it is necessary to create an ICSI. Let me know what to do, I don't have a personal preference either way.
Reply
#3

For.
Reply
#4

I don't see why we need a UN resolution for that. Nations have an advantage if they protect themselves and if they make agreements with other nations to help each other. But I don't think nations should be forced to do anything. Neither should all businesses and organizations within a nation be forced to implement security measures. I'm not just talking about money. Not all organizations need firewalls, as not all organizations have Internet access...
Reply
#5

I concur with Yuunli. I believe it to be overkill. Not terrible, just overkill. I'd vote "no" to send it back for further seasoning.
Reply
#6

YuunliMay 21 2005, 06:59 PM I don't see why we need a UN resolution for that. Nations have an advantage if they protect themselves and if they make agreements with other nations to help each other. But I don't think nations should be forced to do anything. Neither should all businesses and organizations within a nation be forced to implement security measures. I'm not just talking about money. Not all organizations need firewalls, as not all organizations have Internet access... [/quote]
I disagree there. It makes perfect sense to take this to UN level. Computer crime is international, you can't make agreements with 40.000 other nations on this. You need to draw one line. Borders don't count with computer criminality.

On the firewall example you're right, except that it doesn't mandate firewalls, but just gives some examples of several kinds of security measures (emphasis mine):
"Such measures may include, but are not limited to, password protection of systems, data encryption, firewall installation, and virus scanning software, etc."
Reply
#7

FOR.

While there are weaknesses, and perhaps ICSI is not wholly necessary, I think it is a positive step which encourages cooperation but does not force it. It makes international crimes of acts committed across borders in cyberspace. It ensures that, at least within the UN, there is no haven for computer criminals where criminal legislation substantially lags behind technical ability to cause damage.

Additionally, this measure may help defuse fears that the United Nations is just a club for left-wing and bleeding heart resolutions. While it is important to have a heart, it is also important to have a brain. Hackers are not just people having harmless fun, they are criminals and their behaviour must be stopped where possible. To the extent this proposal does that, it is good.
Reply
#8

FOR

Personally I'm in favor of the ICSI.

Even though you have the capability for additional bureaucracy, which I doubt in this case due to funding from voluntary donations, you gain a centralized group that should have their collective finger on the pulse of what's going on. They can then share that knowledge with the rest of us and take appropriate steps to inform the public and assist law enforcement in curtailing deviant behavior.

D
Reply
#9

Based on the current standings, I will vote FOR.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)