06-14-2005, 07:33 PM
Groot GoudaJun 14 2005, 12:53 AM Federation of DisjunctionJun 13 2005, 08:48 PM I also see everyone's point in not wanting a weak resolution to pass but to send it back to be reworked. I'll defer to you as the more experienced writer but isn't part of the process to have a potential resolution reviewed and modified based on feedback? [/quote]
It is, but the author must want to incorporate the feedback. This one didn't. And because it's a "feel-good" resolution, hardly anyone voted against it. Usefull behaviour when you're launching your own proposal, but irritating when a bad proposal like this one hits the floor. [/quote]
That is exactly my take on it as well.
But the people of Mikitivity spoke and said that they didn't see a harm in the resolution. Being landlocked and having a leadership that is responsive to even the craziest ideas of the population, we voted yes.
It is, but the author must want to incorporate the feedback. This one didn't. And because it's a "feel-good" resolution, hardly anyone voted against it. Usefull behaviour when you're launching your own proposal, but irritating when a bad proposal like this one hits the floor. [/quote]
That is exactly my take on it as well.
But the people of Mikitivity spoke and said that they didn't see a harm in the resolution. Being landlocked and having a leadership that is responsive to even the craziest ideas of the population, we voted yes.