10-27-2006, 08:15 PM
Alright, I'll look at the philosophy of what this is trying to accomplish and vote yes.
Ceo: genetically modified crops are currently banned in some European countries and are also banned in Disjunction. The problems are largely speculative since GM foods have really only been grown and used for about 10-15 years. The main concerns are how genetically introduced modifications will affect those who eat the food and the environment in which they're grown. On the positive side, some of these crops are more resistent to disease or require less pesticide use so they do carry obvious immediate benefits. Personally I object to their development on the basis that humans tend to upset the balence of nature when they make modifications and the results are often catastrophic.
So study is a good course of action but I'm personally convinced that it is not the natural way of things and I must trust my gut when it tells me that GM foods are not good for us.
Ceo: genetically modified crops are currently banned in some European countries and are also banned in Disjunction. The problems are largely speculative since GM foods have really only been grown and used for about 10-15 years. The main concerns are how genetically introduced modifications will affect those who eat the food and the environment in which they're grown. On the positive side, some of these crops are more resistent to disease or require less pesticide use so they do carry obvious immediate benefits. Personally I object to their development on the basis that humans tend to upset the balence of nature when they make modifications and the results are often catastrophic.
So study is a good course of action but I'm personally convinced that it is not the natural way of things and I must trust my gut when it tells me that GM foods are not good for us.