10-26-2006, 11:44 PM
Federation of DisjunctionOct 26 2006, 04:35 PM OK, I'm for the concept but have to object and vote no based on the lesson I learned from Antirum about the strangth of the words in the resolution. "Supressing" the use of animal carcasses in feeding livestock is not the same thing as "eliminating" the use. Where's the teeth of this resolution? Also, why not eliminate GM crops instead of studying and testing and limiting them? With limitation comes management. Is this UNSARC going to enforce anything? If so, how? These issues are getting the human race into a lot of trouble. Is this resolution going far enough? I want to vote yes based on the spirit of this. Anyone care to convice me? [/quote]
It does do something, even if it's remotely small.
It establishes the UNSARC, and creates research. But that's about it. And that's kind of why I'm still on the fence. It's better than nothing, but it could be a lot better with stronger language.
It does do something, even if it's remotely small.
It establishes the UNSARC, and creates research. But that's about it. And that's kind of why I'm still on the fence. It's better than nothing, but it could be a lot better with stronger language.