10-20-2006, 02:58 AM
Bears ArmedOct 18 2006, 08:41 AMThe definition's inadequate.
Quote: DEFINING a marriage, for the purpose of this resolution, as a legal bond between two or more people.[/quote] would cover all legal contracts that were between people rather than organisations...[/quote]
Yeah, I realised that. (My DSL died right after I posted, so I couldn't edit it to ask for a better one) I couldn't come up with a good one that wouldn't accidentaly ban polygamy or gay marriage.
Please do give ideas for a different deffinition.
Quote: DEFINING a marriage, for the purpose of this resolution, as a legal bond between two or more people.[/quote] would cover all legal contracts that were between people rather than organisations...[/quote]
Yeah, I realised that. (My DSL died right after I posted, so I couldn't edit it to ask for a better one) I couldn't come up with a good one that wouldn't accidentaly ban polygamy or gay marriage.
Please do give ideas for a different deffinition.

