10-17-2006, 10:52 PM
I'm confused. Why is everyone on the fence or against?
As with many recent resolutions it's rather tame on accountability and does leave itself open to wide interpretation but it seems to say something good. Let each government set the rules of marriage and respect the status in your country of visitors who are from another country and defined as married in that country.
Also I believe its co-author has a puppet in the IDU.
BTW, We in Disjunction share the GS point of view in that the legality of marriage and the religous joining of two committed souls are separate and conferred by different entities.
BTW Klouch, you didn't register a vote here yet since I'm the only yes vote. This could be interesting if we have a tie. We'll then have to discuss whether we're a direct or representative democracy for our Region's vote.
As with many recent resolutions it's rather tame on accountability and does leave itself open to wide interpretation but it seems to say something good. Let each government set the rules of marriage and respect the status in your country of visitors who are from another country and defined as married in that country.
Also I believe its co-author has a puppet in the IDU.
BTW, We in Disjunction share the GS point of view in that the legality of marriage and the religous joining of two committed souls are separate and conferred by different entities.
BTW Klouch, you didn't register a vote here yet since I'm the only yes vote. This could be interesting if we have a tie. We'll then have to discuss whether we're a direct or representative democracy for our Region's vote.