09-07-2006, 08:33 PM
Saidercray says NO.
In all states, there are a lot of unemployed people searching for a job. Their number exceeds the number of advertised employments. Consequently, more than one person applies for one advertised employment.
This enables the employer to chose the candidate who fits best to what is needed - to chose the candidates who is best able to help the employer achieve the employer's aim. The success of an applicant can therefore depend on many different things and qualities: knowledge of foreign languages, the course of life, the ability to work in a team etc. pp.
But are qualities such as these everything that can decide who gets a job and who not? If the proposal passes, the answer can only be no. The employer will be enabled to make working conditions a criterion when he decides whom he will employ. Amongst several candidates with similar qualities, he will be able to, and he will, chose the candidate who accepts the worst working conditions: the one who will work longer than the others, the one who will work for less money than the others.
The "greatest possible degree of freedom" is only the greatest possible degree of the employer's freedom to exploit the employees.
The proposal, if it passes, will sap the rights of the employees. Whoever wants to get a job will have to face the situation that he can either work under bad conditions or that another candidate who agrees to work under bad conditions will get the job.
Bad conditions or no work, shall this become the alternative for the employees? Saidercray thinks no, Saidercray says no. NO ON THIS PROPOSAL.
In all states, there are a lot of unemployed people searching for a job. Their number exceeds the number of advertised employments. Consequently, more than one person applies for one advertised employment.
This enables the employer to chose the candidate who fits best to what is needed - to chose the candidates who is best able to help the employer achieve the employer's aim. The success of an applicant can therefore depend on many different things and qualities: knowledge of foreign languages, the course of life, the ability to work in a team etc. pp.
But are qualities such as these everything that can decide who gets a job and who not? If the proposal passes, the answer can only be no. The employer will be enabled to make working conditions a criterion when he decides whom he will employ. Amongst several candidates with similar qualities, he will be able to, and he will, chose the candidate who accepts the worst working conditions: the one who will work longer than the others, the one who will work for less money than the others.
The "greatest possible degree of freedom" is only the greatest possible degree of the employer's freedom to exploit the employees.
The proposal, if it passes, will sap the rights of the employees. Whoever wants to get a job will have to face the situation that he can either work under bad conditions or that another candidate who agrees to work under bad conditions will get the job.
Bad conditions or no work, shall this become the alternative for the employees? Saidercray thinks no, Saidercray says no. NO ON THIS PROPOSAL.