08-24-2006, 09:55 PM
On the poorly written aspect, it is definately that. I'm sorry it would have to be repealed in order to be improved as I see that as a flaw. To me that is like repealing the US Constitution instead of ammending it.
As far as some people's belief that there is nothing wrong with the ozone, i can't even begin to discuss how incorrect that is so I appreciate your position, Bears.
We're ready to begin to watch for companies who will be in leagal compliance with this resolution but who deviate from ethical compliance by working the loopholes.
We are lucky in Disjunction as there is very little that big business can legally do to hurt the environment so this resolution won't affect us much. We could, however offer a panel of business leaders who have succeeded in building envirnmentally friendly businesses while maintaining a profit. On an unrelated note, these companies are at least partially successful because they acquire and maintain a highly committed and productive workforce through excellent work environment and reasonable compensation.
As far as some people's belief that there is nothing wrong with the ozone, i can't even begin to discuss how incorrect that is so I appreciate your position, Bears.
We're ready to begin to watch for companies who will be in leagal compliance with this resolution but who deviate from ethical compliance by working the loopholes.
We are lucky in Disjunction as there is very little that big business can legally do to hurt the environment so this resolution won't affect us much. We could, however offer a panel of business leaders who have succeeded in building envirnmentally friendly businesses while maintaining a profit. On an unrelated note, these companies are at least partially successful because they acquire and maintain a highly committed and productive workforce through excellent work environment and reasonable compensation.