08-24-2006, 01:57 AM
Federation of DisjunctionAug 23 2006, 11:10 AM I'm with Gnejs and Kees on this one. The wording wasn't terribly eloquent and it should have more specifics, but the importance of taking a stand on such a high impact issue is what I believe to be important in this case. Could I convince some of the nays to discuss further? [/quote]
Well, first off, there's the official topic, where the first post has an argument against it.
And second, I think the percentages are completely arbitrary and don't address the whole problem...and it actually gives the responsibility for reducing everyone's ozone emissions to businesses (read the proposal: it says that businesses are responsible for reducing CFC emissions, not their CFC emissions.
Plus, if we keep passing horrible legislation like this, more will come, as those who don't bother drafting will be heartened...
Well, first off, there's the official topic, where the first post has an argument against it.
And second, I think the percentages are completely arbitrary and don't address the whole problem...and it actually gives the responsibility for reducing everyone's ozone emissions to businesses (read the proposal: it says that businesses are responsible for reducing CFC emissions, not their CFC emissions.
Plus, if we keep passing horrible legislation like this, more will come, as those who don't bother drafting will be heartened...