Repeal "scientific Freedom" - Replacement
#9

OOC:

Overall, this is good. A technical issue... Clause 4d is too narrow, I think:

d. contains plagiarized material or material which by contract was not (yet) to be published;

Suggest:

d. contains plagiarized material or material the publication of which is restricted by contract or as a condition of employment;

Many scientists work for government agencies or corporations with legitimate reasons (e.g., national security, trade secrets) where there is no "contract" involved. Adding "condition of employment" would cover those cases.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)