At Vote: Nuclear Non-proliferation Act
#12

Xtraordinary GentlemenMar 23 2006, 04:05 PM Voted for. I think non-proliferation is a good counter-balance to the UNSA's right to produce anything you want, although I'd prefer the UNSA not exist.

Has anyone successfully done this for biological and/or chemical weapons yet? I'm having a hard time sorting through all the related resolutions, repeals, and mod deletions to figure out what is actually still standing UN law, but those two classes of weapons definitely need to be restricted in similar fashion if they haven't been yet. [/quote]
I don't think anyone has, no. Someone here should write one after this passes.

Quote: Hate to be the wet blanket, but I'm getting tired of these "cannot vote no" answers. Should be a real option... even if it is a regional item. And no, I'm not being sarcastic.[/quote]

As a region, I think we should support any regional resolutions, especially since they are usually edited by members here. Unless I think there is real opposition to a proposal in the region, I will probably continue to give yes/yes options. Unless the majority of the region is opposed to this, then I lose I guess.

EDIT: I voted FOR this proposal.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)