[Xtraordinary Gentlemen]

I'd consider adding a suggested but non-mandatory adoption of the language developed by the UNISLC in article 2. That would, in my eyes at least, eliminate the possibility to contend that it's unworthy of UN consideration, allow qualified non-speakers to more easily obtain UN delegate positions within their governments, and still insure that nations with languages that are incompatible with the UN's ISL could continue developing/using their own sign language. Basically I don't think either camp would have anything left to object to with that addition.