02-16-2006, 06:30 PM
Jonquere-TadoussacFeb 16 2006, 03:34 AM There are a couple areas that aren't covered by this that may be issues, such as firefighters, who must... well... go into burning buildings. Beyond that, it doesn't define excessive danger. [/quote]
It doesn't need to. It shouldn't, even, because that varies so much from workplace to workplace. But it's good enough for judges to make a decision.
As far as firefighters and other high-risk jobs are concerned, that will always remain difficult because some jobs have danger as a job description. You can hardly blame the government for making a war bullet-free.
It doesn't need to. It shouldn't, even, because that varies so much from workplace to workplace. But it's good enough for judges to make a decision.
As far as firefighters and other high-risk jobs are concerned, that will always remain difficult because some jobs have danger as a job description. You can hardly blame the government for making a war bullet-free.