01-18-2006, 10:31 PM
GrosseschnauzerJan 18 2006, 10:23 AM The reason why it is possible to enact a replacement before a repeal is to adopt one or more propoals that cover the same subject matter in a different way. Once the new resolutions are in place, then it is possible to claim redundacy because it would be possible to show how newer resolutions cover all of the "territory" or substantive content of the older proposal.
Then the argument is over the defects in the older proposal and not over leaving a void in a subject matter of concern. It takes a lot a careful drfting, planning and luck to make such a game plan work. [/quote]
That is an incredibly logical argument, and has swayed my government to support the original resolution and vote against the repeal.
Then the argument is over the defects in the older proposal and not over leaving a void in a subject matter of concern. It takes a lot a careful drfting, planning and luck to make such a game plan work. [/quote]
That is an incredibly logical argument, and has swayed my government to support the original resolution and vote against the repeal.