01-17-2006, 08:23 PM
AntriumJan 16 2006, 08:44 PM Antrium votes for.
This is what decided it:
Quote: 2. IMPLORES the General Assembly to ensure speedy replacement of certain admittedly important aspects of "The Law of the Sea" concerning the sovereignty of territorial waters, and its well-intentioned but ineffectively and dangerously executed attempts to combat piracy.[/quote]
I'm worried that no one will replace all these recent repealed resolutions, some of which are fairly essential.
P.S. I'm going to submit my chemical weapons proposal again soon
[/quote]
Well, I've been talking to Gruenberg on the #nswiki channel on mIRC, and he actually has *three* resolutions / proposals that he feels it would take to replace the Law of the Sea. He is interested in putting something else back up, but he also admits that it is going to be difficult.
If this gets repealed, our regional proposal about emergency landing rights might need to be a higher priority.
I'm still debating this. There are some problems with the resolution, but I also agree with what others said here: the UN is simply the best agency to have some say over international waters.
This is what decided it:
Quote: 2. IMPLORES the General Assembly to ensure speedy replacement of certain admittedly important aspects of "The Law of the Sea" concerning the sovereignty of territorial waters, and its well-intentioned but ineffectively and dangerously executed attempts to combat piracy.[/quote]
I'm worried that no one will replace all these recent repealed resolutions, some of which are fairly essential.
P.S. I'm going to submit my chemical weapons proposal again soon
[/quote]Well, I've been talking to Gruenberg on the #nswiki channel on mIRC, and he actually has *three* resolutions / proposals that he feels it would take to replace the Law of the Sea. He is interested in putting something else back up, but he also admits that it is going to be difficult.
If this gets repealed, our regional proposal about emergency landing rights might need to be a higher priority.
I'm still debating this. There are some problems with the resolution, but I also agree with what others said here: the UN is simply the best agency to have some say over international waters.