[Groot Gouda]

I don't have any personal grudge against certain resolution authors, it's just that they produce crap all the time (apart from the natural process, that is). I won't vote for (or against) a resolution just for stats reasons. The stats are the least interesting. If I want to do something about my stats, I'll answer the issues in a particular way. What bothers me about resolutions like this is that they are fluffy. They sound all nice, so why vote against? But at the same time they are either toothless and have no real effect (LaE has said on the forums that if you have problems with this resolution it doesn't matter, because it isn't compulsory - which is nonsense on game-mechanics level), rendering the discussion useless, or they have an effect but it's not desired, no thought has been put into it, and it's domestic policy which simply doesn't make sense on an international level with 30,000 nations.

IT Education is good, but it only makes sense when there is money for those computers, when the other basics (language, maths, social skills, history & geography) are covered. Bringing down dictatorships? A repressive regime will be smarter than that. Simply censor the internet (or don't connect your nation to it). Quite easy to manage. There are better ways to achieve democracy than this resolution.