04-24-2005, 08:53 PM
I used to be firmly opposed to the death penaly as well. . .however, there are individuals who so destroy the very fabric of society, that it is clear they will never be rehabed and the gravity of their crime is so weighty as to forfeit any protections afforded by society. Therefore, in extremely limited cases, I now support the measure.
Don't get me wrong - I think W's Texas is sadistic and insane. To receive a death penalty in my world, you've had to commit mass or serial murder, with premediation. One wouldl have to be found guilty of the crimes, go through a sentancing hearing and then have multiple appeals available. No "fast fry" proposals permitted. . .this is a permanent, irrevokable punishment. However, for a handful of individuals in a lifetime, I do find in warrented in extreme cases.
Don't get me wrong - I think W's Texas is sadistic and insane. To receive a death penalty in my world, you've had to commit mass or serial murder, with premediation. One wouldl have to be found guilty of the crimes, go through a sentancing hearing and then have multiple appeals available. No "fast fry" proposals permitted. . .this is a permanent, irrevokable punishment. However, for a handful of individuals in a lifetime, I do find in warrented in extreme cases.