[Bears Armed]

RansiumAug 29 2016, 07:03:50 PMI think directly addressing the restrictions of WA #68 should be done. I'm curious as to what the best way to do so is, but does WA #66 already makes the taking of endangered species illegal across the WA help?[/quote]The method that some other authors have used for getting around #68 is including a clause in their preambles to claim that the regulations they propose are necessary to prevent "extreme harm to member nation's populations" because of #68 specifically allowing future resolutions to restrict trade when that is the case.

For this proposal, then, maybeso something along the lines of
"Believing that environmental impoverishment due to the loss of native species potentially threatens extreme harm to member nations' populations" ?

:Bear: