05-06-2015, 08:40 AM
Thank you for your feedback.
It's a fair point, focusing WA-effort in environmental issues on cross-border impact. I think I actually remember Mik speaking of it from way back. You could probably make a case for "fracking" reaching that criteria in other ways than just groundwater pollution, but, that said, the water was my main interest and I agree the act you refrenced should cover cross-border instances of contamination caused by fracking.
Thinking over my idea now, it might not be very productive to go into such detail regulating a specific technique/sector based on a principle about "everyone should have clean water". An interest in water should maybe rather result in a proposal dealing with water, as the one you mentioned.
Well, I feel like I've learned a bit. That's always nice. I'll come back if other ideas should strike me.
It's a fair point, focusing WA-effort in environmental issues on cross-border impact. I think I actually remember Mik speaking of it from way back. You could probably make a case for "fracking" reaching that criteria in other ways than just groundwater pollution, but, that said, the water was my main interest and I agree the act you refrenced should cover cross-border instances of contamination caused by fracking.
Thinking over my idea now, it might not be very productive to go into such detail regulating a specific technique/sector based on a principle about "everyone should have clean water". An interest in water should maybe rather result in a proposal dealing with water, as the one you mentioned.
Well, I feel like I've learned a bit. That's always nice. I'll come back if other ideas should strike me.