08-10-2010, 08:58 PM
AlgoriacJul 28 2010, 04:11 AM Well My point is that it is for a more peaceful world. If you have WA nations that have nukes, then non WA nations are more inclined to have nukes. And as a collective whole, we should also draft up WA policy to where if one nation is attacked by a non WA nation with weapons of mass destruction, then as a collective whole all the nations of the WA will retaliate, to their own extent. Whether that means some nations act militarily or others economically is up to them. [/quote]
The WA is not, as a "collective whole", a military alliance: In fact quite a few of its members are more closely allied to various non-WA nations, in that respect, than they are to other WA ones...
How would your suggested resolution cope with cases where a WA nation attacks a non-WA one and the latter's allies (WA or not) then come to its aid?
Also, any such 'mutual military assistance' clause would almost certainly be declared illegal by the Mods anyway...
:Bear:
The WA is not, as a "collective whole", a military alliance: In fact quite a few of its members are more closely allied to various non-WA nations, in that respect, than they are to other WA ones...
How would your suggested resolution cope with cases where a WA nation attacks a non-WA one and the latter's allies (WA or not) then come to its aid?
Also, any such 'mutual military assistance' clause would almost certainly be declared illegal by the Mods anyway...
:Bear: