07-28-2010, 06:16 AM
The whole point I am trying to make is that the less weapons of mass destruction in the world the better. And that is an obvious statement to all. But though we might think that and want that, what good is wanting the world nuclear free when we ourselves aren't nuclear free. If we can prove, which I believe we can, that a nation attacked by any weapon of mass destruction can, with WA support, retaliate with a deliberate, proportional, and humane militaristic act...then we can systematically make the world free of these inhumane weapons. It will be a long process, that I don't deny, but in the end, the world will be a better place

