08-01-2005, 06:27 PM
EcopoeiaAug 1 2005, 09:17 AM
You know, now I look at it, I think 'to reveal' should possibly have been 'make public' instead (Christ, the grammar sucks!). Oops, I guess there's always something that escapes through the editing net. Thankfully, it's minor.
Anyway, I'd still interpret this to mean that the whereabouts of such an individual would be available to such organisations. If families would prefer the information not to made so available, I see the resolution allowing for governments to respect such a wish. I imagine this would be a rare occurrence, however. [/quote]
I'll make sure to pass this along to the Mikitivity Rote Kreuz, however, it is possible that the International Red Cross Organization might "ask" this question on the UN forum.
You know, now I look at it, I think 'to reveal' should possibly have been 'make public' instead (Christ, the grammar sucks!). Oops, I guess there's always something that escapes through the editing net. Thankfully, it's minor.
Anyway, I'd still interpret this to mean that the whereabouts of such an individual would be available to such organisations. If families would prefer the information not to made so available, I see the resolution allowing for governments to respect such a wish. I imagine this would be a rare occurrence, however. [/quote]
I'll make sure to pass this along to the Mikitivity Rote Kreuz, however, it is possible that the International Red Cross Organization might "ask" this question on the UN forum.