06-11-2008, 06:18 AM
GrosseschnauzerJun 8 2008, 03:38 PM This resolution seems to have the most blatant call to the National Sovereignists I've ever seen in a repeal.
I'm tempted to oppose just for that, but INDECIDED for now. [/quote]
I abstained.
I completely agree. I didn't care for the original because it did sort of read too heavily into the finer details of life, but I also generally do not like repeals.
Parts of this repeal are very well written ... I'm not going to vote against it. But I also don't know if I completely agree with the statement, "Further regretting that the resolution allows defendants any number of appeals they wish,". I don't think this is untrue, but I also am undecided if this is consistent with my view.
I do feel there is a strong point I'll toss out as a possible reason to vote in favour:
"Seeking the opportunity to introduce a more effective version of this resolution to the World Assembly,"
Overall DE did a great job with the repeal and isn't closing the door.
I'm tempted to oppose just for that, but INDECIDED for now. [/quote]
I abstained.
I completely agree. I didn't care for the original because it did sort of read too heavily into the finer details of life, but I also generally do not like repeals.
Parts of this repeal are very well written ... I'm not going to vote against it. But I also don't know if I completely agree with the statement, "Further regretting that the resolution allows defendants any number of appeals they wish,". I don't think this is untrue, but I also am undecided if this is consistent with my view.
I do feel there is a strong point I'll toss out as a possible reason to vote in favour:
"Seeking the opportunity to introduce a more effective version of this resolution to the World Assembly,"
Overall DE did a great job with the repeal and isn't closing the door.