07-12-2005, 09:16 PM
baranxtuJul 12 2005, 10:29 AM My government, after long and careful consideration, has decided to vote against this resolution.
Of course this is not due to its general intentions - Baranxtu is fully supporting civil rights - , but solely because of the wording. Some of the points should have been further explained (especially the phrase 'just cause'). [/quote]
That is a fair and understandible position. If the resolution were to be repealed (since passage seems likely at this point), is the basic idea in given civilians in occupied countries rights something your government would like to see addressed again (possibly)? In other words, should our Delegates continue to endorse these sorts of proposals?
Of course this is not due to its general intentions - Baranxtu is fully supporting civil rights - , but solely because of the wording. Some of the points should have been further explained (especially the phrase 'just cause'). [/quote]
That is a fair and understandible position. If the resolution were to be repealed (since passage seems likely at this point), is the basic idea in given civilians in occupied countries rights something your government would like to see addressed again (possibly)? In other words, should our Delegates continue to endorse these sorts of proposals?