Vote: Repeal "Required Basic Healthcare"
#1

Repeal "Required Basic Healthcare"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal


Resolution: #17


Proposed by: Powerhungry Chipmunks

Description: UN Resolution #17: Required Basic Healthcare (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The United Nations,

CALLING TO MIND the passage of ?Required Basic Healthcare? from June 5, 2003 and its presumed ?replacement?, ??RBH? Replacement? from June 26, 2003,

RECOGNIZING ?Required Basic Healthcare? as a valuable reference document, though outdated in its methods of delivery, as conceded by ?RBH Replacement?,

RECOGNIZING FURTHER the UN?s decision that ?Required Basic Healthcare? not be enforced, as per clause 1 of ??RBH? Replacement? which states, ?[t]he resolution ?Required Basic Healthcare? is to be no longer enforced by the UN?,

NOTING the possible confusion to member nations over which resolution to enforce given the lack of the ?repeal mechanic? at the time of passage for ?Required Basic Healthcare? and ?RBH Replacement?,

NOTING FURTHER other older, poorly-worded resolutions or sets of resolutions which came about prior to the ability to repeal and CALLING for repeals to all such resolutions in order to clarify the international law imposed on member nations by the UN,

AIMING to make easily understandable the UN?s enforcement regarding healthcare,

DETERMINING it a clerical and technical necessity to repeal ?Required Basic Healthcare?, as well as a required measure to elevate the nature of legislation in the UN:

REPEALS ?Required Basic Healthcare?.

Voting Ends: Fri May 13 2005
Reply
#2

As this is an administrative repeal, I wouldn't know why not to vote FOR. But I have no strong feelings either way. It may be redundant, but it doesn't do any harm either.
Reply
#3

FOR


My Government believes in efficiency of Government, and repealing redundant or obsolete laws is part of that process.
Reply
#4

As long as it's repeal of redundant language - fine by the Empire of Keeslandia.
Reply
#5

I agree with Lloegr-Cymru and Keeslandia.
Reply
#6

Considering the current voting, I am setting the vote on NS to FOR, but if opinion changes I shall do so too.
Reply
#7

Resolution ?Required Basic Healthcare? seems to be a good idea. Since my moto is to fight against poverty in the world, I see it as a reason to vote for it.

So I would like to ask Groot Gouda, if he could create a forum if we don't have, where we could place a proposals to discuse about.

Scoopy
Reply
#8

Quote: Resolution ?Required Basic Healthcare? seems to be a good idea. Since my moto is to fight against poverty in the world, I see it as a reason to vote for it.[/quote]
This proposal is not for basic healthcare. If you vote FOR, you want to repeal (buiten werking stellen) the resolution "Required Basic Healthcare", because there is another resolution replacing "Required Basic Healthcare". Voting FOR this resolution is simply supporting an efficient government.

Ik hoop dat was verstaanbaar... :unsure:

Quote: So I would like to ask Groot Gouda, if he could create a forum if we don't have, where we could place a proposals to discuse about. [/quote]
Isn't "UN Resolutions and Proposals" appropriate?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)