Liberate Land Of The Liberals
#1

Liberate Land of the Liberals
A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region

Category: Liberation
Nominee (region): Land of the Liberals
Proposed by: Unibotian WA Mission

Description: The Security Council,

Noting that Land of the Liberals continues to be oppressed under the regime of New Earth, and its iron fist delegate, Spooks I;

Defines...
(1) "Native" as a nation which takes up residence in a region without the intention of furthering the goals and aims of a foreign force;
(2) "Regional Sovereignty" as the collective right of natives to the administration of their region;
(3) "Regional Destruction" as the ejection of all of the natives of a region by a delegate whose actions are not supported by said natives;

Understanding that the World Assembly has the ability to limit the administrative parameters of a delegate;

Believing that delegates who are not natives of their region generally are poor representatives and participants of the World Assembly, depending on the goals and aims of the foreign force which they are furthering;

Further Believing that the World Assembly has entrusted the Security Council with the solemn task of enabling regional sovereignty while regulating such unruly delegates;

Recognizing that the delegate of Land of the Liberals is primarily interested in furthering the empire of New Earth, and is not concerned with the well-being or representing the values of those residing in Land of the Liberals who do not share his foreign interests;

For he has,

? Banned nations such as Maressia for having a democratic socialist government (with no respect for the nature or the spirit of the region in which he is delegate);
? Threatened natives with the decision either to surrender to the authority of New Earth or receive ejection and banishment;
? Implemented a password which is hidden to residents, for the purposes of refounding and gaining even more control through the destruction of the region;

Disgusted that the delegate of Land of the Liberals previously attempted to undermine the World Assembly by temporarily acting above suspicion of all nefarious intentions;

Aware of at least one native, Moralesia, which has declared their disapproval of their region's new administration and their wish for a liberation effort;

Noting that, with native support, defending and other third-party organizations will likely be more inclined to assist with further peacekeeping efforts in Land of the Liberals than before, thus furthering the protection of regional sovereignty and the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill;

Hereby Revokes the ability of this victimized region?s delegate to password protect the region.

Co-authored by Sedgistan, Naivetry and Whamabama.
Reply
#2

Despite the name, this one looks to be a very different beast to the first attempt. That said, I'm still exercising my Abstention here.
Reply
#3

Abstain
Reply
#4

To me, it seems like exactly the sort of thing this type of ruling is meant for. My vote is For.
Reply
#5

FOR. I think that the defenders should have a chance at liberating this region.
Reply
#6

... and now it appears that Land of the Liberals has been part of an attempt to hoodwink the WA, for a second time.

The player behind the original founder of the region has turned up (founding nation having been deleted for rule-breaking way back when), pointing out that LotL was only ever a puppet dumping ground for the DEN (a raiding group). The backers (Unibot and Sedge mainly) have agreed it's not worth pursuing.

I would really prefer to withdraw our FOR vote. If people agree, I'll leave it as an Abstention.
Reply
#7

Unibot still swears that one of the "natives" is a true native, not a raider or defender puppet. Supposedly it's just some bloke who wandered in there and settled, oblivious to the fact that he was settling in a raider puppet dump. That may be true, but even so is it worth all this uproar to liberate the region (twice!) just on behalf of one nation that is "probably" a native?

I didn't vote in your poll since my WA nation resides in another region but I am very suspicious of BOTH sides in this mess and would advise you to abstain.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)