02-20-2006, 06:35 PM
Congrats!
:wave: :123hup: :funky_pisang: :micky: :topspin: :roll: :jump: :yeah: :boogie:
:wave: :123hup: :funky_pisang: :micky: :topspin: :roll: :jump: :yeah: :boogie:
02-20-2006, 08:55 PM
I've been looking for something that warrants this "smilie":
:pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang:
Birthdays are like PBJ with a baseball bat.
Have a good one!
:pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang: :pisang:
Birthdays are like PBJ with a baseball bat.
Have a good one!
02-21-2006, 10:25 AM
AntriumFeb 20 2006, 08:47 AM Happy Birthday!! :wave: :wave: :clapurhands: :duck:
I don't think you are really 1 however... [/quote]
Could be a "government" mix-up!
When I first was working for the State of California at my current job, they had my birthday listed in their records as Jan. 1, 2000. Yes, despite labour laws, California had at the time a 1-year old working as an engineer.
My boss tried to fix it, but she didn't have access to birthday info ... only personnel admins could change it. Eventually somebody caught the mistake and changed by birthday to Jan. 1, 1969. Why 1969 I will NEVER know ... but that is what they did. Since we can tap into our retirement at age 55, I've been very quiet about the fact that I'm two years younger than the government *thinks* I am.
Crazy thing: my passport and driver's license are both correct.
So happy FIRST birthday Ceorana! :topspin:
I don't think you are really 1 however... [/quote]
Could be a "government" mix-up!
When I first was working for the State of California at my current job, they had my birthday listed in their records as Jan. 1, 2000. Yes, despite labour laws, California had at the time a 1-year old working as an engineer.
My boss tried to fix it, but she didn't have access to birthday info ... only personnel admins could change it. Eventually somebody caught the mistake and changed by birthday to Jan. 1, 1969. Why 1969 I will NEVER know ... but that is what they did. Since we can tap into our retirement at age 55, I've been very quiet about the fact that I'm two years younger than the government *thinks* I am.
Crazy thing: my passport and driver's license are both correct.
So happy FIRST birthday Ceorana! :topspin:
02-21-2006, 03:29 PM
MikitivityFeb 21 2006, 09:25 AM Eventually somebody caught the mistake and changed by birthday to Jan. 1, 1969. Why 1969 I will NEVER know ... [/quote]
Cos you're a hippie child, of course!
Cos you're a hippie child, of course!
02-23-2006, 06:26 AM
Groot GoudaFeb 21 2006, 05:29 AM MikitivityFeb 21 2006, 09:25 AM Eventually somebody caught the mistake and changed by birthday to Jan. 1, 1969. Why 1969 I will NEVER know ... [/quote]
Cos you're a hippie child, of course! [/quote]
:vom:
I certainly hope not!
Cos you're a hippie child, of course! [/quote]
:vom:
I certainly hope not!
02-23-2006, 06:36 AM
Official Press Release
Department of Real Life Affairs, Nordic Republic of Ceorana
WHEREAS it has been noted that the real life representative of Ceorana has had his date of birth misrepresented;
WHEREAS Ceorana does not wish to spread misinformation;
THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED that:
1. BE IT KNOWN that the real life representative of Ceorana (hereafter "RLRoC") is not indeed one year old;
2. BE IT KNOWN that Ceorana hereby finds it necessary to conceal the age of its RLRoC due to personal concerns;
3. BE IT KNOWN that this was solely because of STUPID INVISIONFREE MAKING ME PUT IN A YEAR the fact that this body requires that a year must be input, and 2005 was deemed the best year to avoid misconceptions;
Department of Real Life Affairs, Nordic Republic of Ceorana
WHEREAS it has been noted that the real life representative of Ceorana has had his date of birth misrepresented;
WHEREAS Ceorana does not wish to spread misinformation;
THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED that:
1. BE IT KNOWN that the real life representative of Ceorana (hereafter "RLRoC") is not indeed one year old;
2. BE IT KNOWN that Ceorana hereby finds it necessary to conceal the age of its RLRoC due to personal concerns;
3. BE IT KNOWN that this was solely because of STUPID INVISIONFREE MAKING ME PUT IN A YEAR the fact that this body requires that a year must be input, and 2005 was deemed the best year to avoid misconceptions;
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)