Thread Closed

Passed:Nuclear Arms Possession Act
#1

Quote: 
REALIZING that WA members are outnumbered by non members by about 3 to 1,

ACKNOWLEDGING the fact that only WA members are required to comply with WA resolutions,

NOTICING the fact that many non member nations are hostile towards WA members,

REALIZING that the WA members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked,

1. DECLARES that WA members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations,

2. PRESERVES the right for individual nations to decide if they want to possess nuclear weapons,

3. REQUIRES that any nation choosing to possess nuclear weapons take every available precaution to ensure that their weapons do not fall into the wrong hands.
[/quote]
#2

Against
#3

Boo, against.

Isn't this an exact copy of a UN resolution, but with all the UNs changed to WA?
#4

Against then, I suppose.
#5

Not a WA member, but couldn't help myself = very much against
#6

The spirit is... interesting, and to some degree true, I guess, but this could be a little better fleshed out rather than a carte blanche for possessions. And 'wrong hands'? Have you seen some WA members?

So, frankly, against. And looking at the vote totals, it may actually matter this time, as it's pretty close.
#7

It would have helped if the author could correctly dpell in the tttle.

AGAINST.
#8

Yeah, totally agree with Jagera.

AGAINST.
#9

GrosseschnauzerJun 4 2008, 01:32 AM It would have helped if the author could correctly dpell in the tttle.

[/quote]
No, that's me, sorry.
#10

Against.
#11

I can see where this is going, regions vote cast AGAINST.
#12

This resolution has passed.
Thread Closed


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)