12-05-2006, 01:21 AM
Woohoo! Break out the Champaign! :yeah:
12-05-2006, 01:22 AM
Ceo, I can't read the link you posted and not feel like there wasn't an agenda here. The authors of this repeal have no support for anything to replace it.
Also, I too noticed the "tree hugger" distinction and feel that this underscores the fact that they have a deviant agenda since they state in the repeal that this is being offered in order to pass more effective legislation.
This is subversive and I've had enough. I'm no longer voting for any repeal unless we can get the UN rules changed to allow a replacement to be voted on along with the repeal. That way if a repeal has no replacement you know you're voting just to get rid of the resolution not to make the way open for a better one to be named later. These people want to sell us the Brooklyn Bridge. They're grifters. We've been flim flammed like the silly little trusting people that we are. BTW, I include myself in the group of those who were fooled by the language of the repeal.
Has anyone taken a look at the factbook entry of the folks who submitted this repeal? I'm particularly interested in the sentence that says "nations seeking refuge from UN tyrany"
Antarctic Oasis
World Factbook Entry: A haven for megalomaniacal rulers plotting to terrorize the world community at large with exploding penguins, foul-mouthed dolphins, anti-UN gnomes, exhibitionist commandos and overzealous callgirls, Antarctic Oasis provides an array of services for rogue nations seeking refuge from UN tyranny. For more info, check our awe-diddly-awesome off-site forum: s11.invisionfree.com/antarctic_oasis.
Edit: Ausserland you're from there? Can you provide some explination? I'm getting a bad vibe here from the agenda behind these repeals.
Also, I too noticed the "tree hugger" distinction and feel that this underscores the fact that they have a deviant agenda since they state in the repeal that this is being offered in order to pass more effective legislation.
This is subversive and I've had enough. I'm no longer voting for any repeal unless we can get the UN rules changed to allow a replacement to be voted on along with the repeal. That way if a repeal has no replacement you know you're voting just to get rid of the resolution not to make the way open for a better one to be named later. These people want to sell us the Brooklyn Bridge. They're grifters. We've been flim flammed like the silly little trusting people that we are. BTW, I include myself in the group of those who were fooled by the language of the repeal.
Has anyone taken a look at the factbook entry of the folks who submitted this repeal? I'm particularly interested in the sentence that says "nations seeking refuge from UN tyrany"
Antarctic Oasis
World Factbook Entry: A haven for megalomaniacal rulers plotting to terrorize the world community at large with exploding penguins, foul-mouthed dolphins, anti-UN gnomes, exhibitionist commandos and overzealous callgirls, Antarctic Oasis provides an array of services for rogue nations seeking refuge from UN tyranny. For more info, check our awe-diddly-awesome off-site forum: s11.invisionfree.com/antarctic_oasis.
Edit: Ausserland you're from there? Can you provide some explination? I'm getting a bad vibe here from the agenda behind these repeals.
12-05-2006, 11:11 AM
What we really need first is for someone to go through the NS official UN resolutions "through history" and compile a list of all of the repealed resolutions that ought to have replacements.
Let's get an idea of what hasn't been done in the way of replacements and work out a master list.
Let's get an idea of what hasn't been done in the way of replacements and work out a master list.
12-05-2006, 01:54 PM
Quote: What we really need first is for someone to go through the NS official UN resolutions "through history" and compile a list of all of the repealed resolutions that ought to have replacements.
Let's get an idea of what hasn't been done in the way of replacements and work out a master list. [/quote]
Thats a great idea! I would be willing to help out. Although im not sure where one might find these.
Let's get an idea of what hasn't been done in the way of replacements and work out a master list. [/quote]
Thats a great idea! I would be willing to help out. Although im not sure where one might find these.
12-05-2006, 03:24 PM
At NSwiki, they have a resolution chronology including all those resolutions which have been repealed.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)