[Eisophca]

Whereby UN Resolution #7 Sexual Freedom shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The United Nations

RECOGNIZING the Universal right to privacy for sexual relations;

COMMENDING the intent of Sexual Freedom to protect such privacy;

MINDFUL, however, that incidents, crimes or accidents may occur during the course of consensual sexual activity of which government agencies should be made aware;

FEARFUL that loose interpretations of Sexual Freedom's broad language may result in such incidents not being properly reported or investigated;

WISHING to curtail continued omissions;

ENCOURAGING a more detailed replacement; hereby

REPEALS UNR#7 Sexual Freedom

[Mikitivity]

Today I looked at the original resolution and the repeal. I understand and agree with the point behind the original resolution, however, it could stand to look fancier ... more "UN" like. The repeal authors *do* have a nice looking replacement that is ready to go and seem serious about submitting that.

So ... I'm abstaining. If the repeal can pass, I would like our Delegate to endorse the replacement. But ultimately I'm leaving it to the rest of you to decide.

[Federation of Disjunction]

Am I the only one who wishes that we could repeal and vote in a replacement simultaneously? I feel this would address some of the concern that having a weaker resolution is better than having none at all.

On this one I'm in favor as long as we can be confident of the relacement being on the front burner.

[Antrium]

I'll vote for and hope for the replacement to pass.

I also wish there was a repeal-and-replace option, it would make the UN so much better. Then there wouldn't be that chance that no replacement would ever pass and everyone would forget about it.

[Malabra]

I'm guessing this didn't pass, as I just approved another proposal that repeals that resolution. It'll be comming up here in a minute, as I believe it's in queue.