10-21-2009, 07:26 PM
The faunas and floras that have been described for various parts of this region so far generally appear quite similar, overall, to ones that can also be found in various parts of the ?RL? Earth?s continents of Europe and North America, although those that have been described for parts of our ?Southern Continent? ? and for certain of the more southerly areas on the ?Northern Continent?, such as the nation of Malabra, too ? are rather more ?exotic? in composition.
Why?
The continents and islands that collectively comprise this region are apparently separated by significant expanses of ocean from any other land-masses, although the maps of the Bears suggest knowledge of one further continent ? or, at least, a very large island ? that covers part of the Arctic (subject to approval by the rest of you, of course?) as well, and considering the relatively slow rates of movement that are involved in the process of ?Continental Drift ?this situation has presumably applied for some considerable time? perhaps even since the break-up of the world?s former supercontinent towards the end of the Mesozoic Era.
We could assume that the native faunas and floras of our region were all ? with the exception of those species that were ?obviously? brought here by Humans or other sapients during the last few millennia ? derived solely from stocks that were already present in the equivalents of the lands (& seas) concerned when this region as such became distinct from whatever former super-continents were involved, having evolved in parallel to those in the RL continents that I have already named. This, however, would have required what I myself would consider to have been an unbelievably high level of coincidence, especially as many of the stocks that exist in those RL continents today (especially amongst the Mammals and birds, which tend to be the most conspicuous elements of most lands? faunas) actually underwent significant stages of their evolutionary histories on other continents instead before migrating into those lands? which the apparently long period of geographical isolation that our own region has undergone would have made extremely improbable here?
Alternatively, we could assume that the native faunas and floras of our region were all ? with the exception of those species that were ?obviously? brought here by Humans or other sapients during the last few millennia ? derived solely from stocks that have all migrated here ? through the wonders of ?Fractal Reality? ? after their species had evolved to their present states within the appropriate parts of the RL Earth. This, however, would raise the question of what lived here before their arrival, and what happened to it? One might argue that as the ?immigrant? species would have evolved in an environment where more competition was possible than would have been the case here they were therefore possessed of greater ?vigour? than the native life-forms, which they therefore were able to displace completely? although in my opinion the fact that the ?native? species would have evolved to cope with local conditions that might not have been exactly the same as those from which the ?immigrant? stocks arrived might well have helped to balance that factor (whose hypothetical application in some RL situations, such as the ?Great Faunal Interchange? that occurred when the two Americas finally came into contact with each other a few million years ago, is no longer considered credible as widely as was formerly the case?) and thus have helped some of the ?native? forms to out-compete their newly-arrived rivals and survive?
(The rather ?patchwork? patterns of distribution that the ?rival? ?European? and ?North American? faunas and floras currently enjoy within the region would certainly suggest that at least some areas acquired the species concerned from other ?Realities?, rather than that all of those species spread purely through ?normal? processes of range-extension that took place solely within the region.)
The most likely situation, in my opinion, is that the current faunas and floras are actually a mixture of stocks that have evolved ?locally? since the region became geographically distinct, stocks that have undergone some evolution here since their ancestral species arrived from RL Earth (or elsewhere) in the distant past, and species that only made the transition hence after they had evolved into their current states. Those stocks that have been here for longest would obviously have had the most opportunity to evolve differently from their closest RL counterparts...
Why?
The continents and islands that collectively comprise this region are apparently separated by significant expanses of ocean from any other land-masses, although the maps of the Bears suggest knowledge of one further continent ? or, at least, a very large island ? that covers part of the Arctic (subject to approval by the rest of you, of course?) as well, and considering the relatively slow rates of movement that are involved in the process of ?Continental Drift ?this situation has presumably applied for some considerable time? perhaps even since the break-up of the world?s former supercontinent towards the end of the Mesozoic Era.
We could assume that the native faunas and floras of our region were all ? with the exception of those species that were ?obviously? brought here by Humans or other sapients during the last few millennia ? derived solely from stocks that were already present in the equivalents of the lands (& seas) concerned when this region as such became distinct from whatever former super-continents were involved, having evolved in parallel to those in the RL continents that I have already named. This, however, would have required what I myself would consider to have been an unbelievably high level of coincidence, especially as many of the stocks that exist in those RL continents today (especially amongst the Mammals and birds, which tend to be the most conspicuous elements of most lands? faunas) actually underwent significant stages of their evolutionary histories on other continents instead before migrating into those lands? which the apparently long period of geographical isolation that our own region has undergone would have made extremely improbable here?
Alternatively, we could assume that the native faunas and floras of our region were all ? with the exception of those species that were ?obviously? brought here by Humans or other sapients during the last few millennia ? derived solely from stocks that have all migrated here ? through the wonders of ?Fractal Reality? ? after their species had evolved to their present states within the appropriate parts of the RL Earth. This, however, would raise the question of what lived here before their arrival, and what happened to it? One might argue that as the ?immigrant? species would have evolved in an environment where more competition was possible than would have been the case here they were therefore possessed of greater ?vigour? than the native life-forms, which they therefore were able to displace completely? although in my opinion the fact that the ?native? species would have evolved to cope with local conditions that might not have been exactly the same as those from which the ?immigrant? stocks arrived might well have helped to balance that factor (whose hypothetical application in some RL situations, such as the ?Great Faunal Interchange? that occurred when the two Americas finally came into contact with each other a few million years ago, is no longer considered credible as widely as was formerly the case?) and thus have helped some of the ?native? forms to out-compete their newly-arrived rivals and survive?
(The rather ?patchwork? patterns of distribution that the ?rival? ?European? and ?North American? faunas and floras currently enjoy within the region would certainly suggest that at least some areas acquired the species concerned from other ?Realities?, rather than that all of those species spread purely through ?normal? processes of range-extension that took place solely within the region.)
The most likely situation, in my opinion, is that the current faunas and floras are actually a mixture of stocks that have evolved ?locally? since the region became geographically distinct, stocks that have undergone some evolution here since their ancestral species arrived from RL Earth (or elsewhere) in the distant past, and species that only made the transition hence after they had evolved into their current states. Those stocks that have been here for longest would obviously have had the most opportunity to evolve differently from their closest RL counterparts...


unglasses:
in mind that in the terms I was discussing the Sidh Ohn are not "new" to the region, only the Nation as it currently exists is. So you have a nomadic people that, despite learning everything they can, spend centuries if not millenia maintaining an ancient form of existence with only sporadic (usually violent or trading based) interactions with the developing nations that would eventually form the IDU. The nation would only have "officially" formed when driven from every other place, they stormed the lands ruled by Frontenax and established their own nation. So, while their cultural memory may include the "geologic upheaval", it does not mean that it would have occured in recent or even "IDU" history but rather at some point in the regions "mythic" past. As such, while the continental drift would have been relatively rapid by normal geologic standards, it likely would actually have taken centuries if not a millenia to complete.
The Muircine in particular are well disposed to the northern Ursines (not many others, but there you go...