03-02-2007, 12:15 AM
pagemasterMar 1 2007, 06:49 PM Are you trying to imply something Groot? [/quote]
I'm always implying something
Generally, resolution that come from the IDU are sensible, broad and proper resolutions in all. I've supported IDU resolutions without properly reading them and will continue to do so, I've never been disappointed.
And this is a good resolution. It gives a right, restricts it for the purpose of broad acceptance and pragmatism (the exemption clause), and leaves the rest to individual nations. The way the repeal author is misrepresenting this resolution is objectionable.
And I'm simply pissed off that someone's trying to repeal one of my resolutions. I mean, I wanted to come back quietly and just go along for a bit, only spending time when I had it, and now I have to defend the resolution again. Bugger.
I'm always implying something
Generally, resolution that come from the IDU are sensible, broad and proper resolutions in all. I've supported IDU resolutions without properly reading them and will continue to do so, I've never been disappointed.
And this is a good resolution. It gives a right, restricts it for the purpose of broad acceptance and pragmatism (the exemption clause), and leaves the rest to individual nations. The way the repeal author is misrepresenting this resolution is objectionable.
And I'm simply pissed off that someone's trying to repeal one of my resolutions. I mean, I wanted to come back quietly and just go along for a bit, only spending time when I had it, and now I have to defend the resolution again. Bugger.