IDU Regional Forum
Idea for UN Proposal - Printable Version

+- IDU Regional Forum (https://idugov.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Government Square (https://idugov.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=101)
+--- Forum: WA Delegate's Bureau (https://idugov.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+---- Forum: General Assembly Resolutions (https://idugov.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+---- Thread: Idea for UN Proposal (/showthread.php?tid=270)



Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 08-20-2005

I thought today that a good UN proposal would be Advertising Standards, so far I've thought of a few things for this proposal to cover:

1. Banning false advertising
2. On TV, speaking the price of the item instead of having it in fine print, and also speaking side effects of prescription drugs, etc.
3. Possibly making a limit of how small fine print can be so that the average person can read it?

If you can think of more topics this should cover or suggestions about those topics, let me know. Once I know the topics to cover I'll write a draft.


Idea for UN Proposal - Mikitivity - 08-21-2005

AntriumAug 20 2005, 02:51 PM I thought today that a good UN proposal would be Advertising Standards, so far I've thought of a few things for this proposal to cover:

1. Banning false advertising
2. On TV, speaking the price of the item instead of having it in fine print, and also speaking side effects of prescription drugs, etc.
3. Possibly making a limit of how small fine print can be so that the average person can read it?

If you can think of more topics this should cover or suggestions about those topics, let me know. Once I know the topics to cover I'll write a draft. [/quote]
The issue with advertising is that I see that being similar to how the Sex Education Act is turning out ... meaning some nations will feel that domestically they can handle it.

That said, I'm not ruling out the subject, but it would be nice to think of an international issue around advertising. I would think another way to tackle this might be to suggest that products that are marketed towards multiple countries and have different languages should make sure that what is written on one language on the label is the same as the other languages. I know this isn't what you had in mind, but it seems to me that it is *one* way to turn this into a kind of international issue.


Idea for UN Proposal - Groot Gouda - 08-21-2005

On an international scale, I think there is more point in rules about labelling. When is something "fresh" for example? Things like that. And I'd like to have the Groot Gouda cheese protected against so-called "real Gouda cheese" made in other countries.


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 08-21-2005

Quote: I would think another way to tackle this might be to suggest that products that are marketed towards multiple countries and have different languages should make sure that what is written on one language on the label is the same as the other languages. I know this isn't what you had in mind, but it seems to me that it is *one* way to turn this into a kind of international issue. [/quote]

Great idea. That seems like a better direction for this proposal to go. Possibly turning it into "Labeling Standards"

Quote: When is something "fresh" for example? [/quote]

Another label worth defining would be "organic". "Fresh" will be slightly harder to define, but definitely one to be added.

Another thing worth possibly adding would be requiring that each package have where the product was made...I guess that would solve the Groot Gouda cheese problem Smile


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 08-25-2005

Here is the first draft....feel free to leave comments and criticisms and anything else really, I am planning on changing it if needed. Smile

Labeling Standards

Category: I have no idea?if you know tell me Smile
Strength: Mild

SEEING THAT some companies may label their products incorrectly, this proposal imposes the following:

I. If a product is marketed in one or multiple countries that speak different official languages, all labels on the product must be in all languages spoken, and must all translate to mean the same thing.

II. Defining ?fresh? as ?not stale, sour, or decayed? and ?not altered by processing,? and defining ?organic? as ?food produced with the use of feed or fertilizer of plant or animal origin without employment of chemically formulated fertilizers, growth stimulants, antibiotics, or pesticides.? Nothing may be labeled ?fresh? or ?organic? unless it fits the above definition.

III. All packaged products must be labeled with (if applicable) the ingredients of the product, nutrition facts, which should include the amount of fat, trans fat, saturated fat, carbohydrates, sugars, sodium, protein, vitamins and minerals, and calories in the product. Also, all packaged products must be labeled with the country where the product was grown/made.


Idea for UN Proposal - Groot Gouda - 08-25-2005

Perhaps a bit more in the pre-amble bit about why you are proposing this, but otherwise this looks fine.

Hmm, that's 3 nearly-ready resolutions we've got ready. We can dominate the UN for weeks Smile


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 08-25-2005

Yes, the preamble is horrible but I couldn't think of anything to say...I had been doing homework for 3 hours before writing this so I wasn't thinking very clearly Smile

How about this?

UPDATED PREAMBLE:
SEEING THAT some companies label their products incorrectly, or may misuse words like ?fresh? and ?organic?, and also seeing that there is a rising number of people on diets that need to be able to know what is in what they are eating, this proposal imposes the following:


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 08-27-2005

I am submitting this proposal right now, with the updated preamble, and also I reworded a bit of it so that I could put it under the Human Rights category, because I have no idea what category it would go under if I didn't.

An approval from Sober Thought would be much appreciated Smile


Idea for UN Proposal - Groot Gouda - 08-27-2005

It's fine that you submit it, but it'd be better if you post the finished result first so we can think about it again.

Secondly, in order for your proposal to be successfull, you'll need to telegram a lot of delegates. For previous resolutions the campaign needed to tell about 2-300 delegates for the 140 or so endorsements.


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 08-29-2005

Quote: It's fine that you submit it, but it'd be better if you post the finished result first so we can think about it again. [/quote]

Here it is now, I would have done it sooner but I was out of town this weekend.

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Antrium

Description: SEEING THAT some companies may label their products incorrectly, or misuse words like ?fresh? and ?organic?, and also seeing that there is a rising number of people on diets that need to be able to know what is in what they are eating, this proposal imposes the following:

I. If a product is marketed in one or multiple countries that speak different official languages, all labels on the product must be in all languages spoken, and must all translate to mean the same thing.

II. Defining ?fresh? as ?not stale, sour, or decayed? and ?not altered by processing,? and defining ?organic? as ?food produced with the use of feed or fertilizer of plant or animal origin without employment of chemically formulated fertilizers, growth stimulants, antibiotics, or pesticides.? Nothing may be labeled ?fresh? or ?organic? unless it fits the above definition.

III. All people have the right to know what is in the food they eat. This means all packaged products must be labeled with (if applicable) the ingredients of the product, and nutrition facts, which should include the amount of fat, trans fat, saturated fat, carbohydrates, sugars, sodium, protein, vitamins and minerals, and calories in the product. Also, all packaged products must be labeled with the country where the product was grown/made.




Quote: Secondly, in order for your proposal to be successfull, you'll need to telegram a lot of delegates. For previous resolutions the campaign needed to tell about 2-300 delegates for the 140 or so endorsements. [/quote]

I have (EDIT: 73 Smile) endorsements now (over half! yay! :waveSmileand it ends tomorrow, so it won't make it. But I didn't telegram anyone (again, out of town) so I made a list of the nations who endorsed it and I will send them a telegram asking for their support again when I re-submit it, and then I will telegram some other nations and I think that after another try or two, it will make it Big Grin


Idea for UN Proposal - Mikitivity - 08-30-2005

Groot GoudaAug 27 2005, 02:36 AM It's fine that you submit it, but it'd be better if you post the finished result first so we can think about it again.

Secondly, in order for your proposal to be successfull, you'll need to telegram a lot of delegates. For previous resolutions the campaign needed to tell about 2-300 delegates for the 140 or so endorsements. [/quote]
Yup, I typically send out telegrams in 50 delegate lots and use the Delegate Votes on whatever resolution is on the floor as a "shopping list".


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 08-30-2005

Ooh good thinking Smile
I'll do that when I re-submit it. I'll probably do that in a few days.


Idea for UN Proposal - Groot Gouda - 08-30-2005

And don't forget to also post it in the UN forum. Best do that if there's still a possibility of changing something. Sometimes they pick up something we haven't thought of, and you get more varying opinions there.


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 08-31-2005

OK, I'll post it there now. I'm going to try to get it perfect before I submit it again Smile


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 09-03-2005

I'm getting feedback from the UN forums, and have changed a few little things, I'm going to wait another day or two and probably submit it Monday (I will have time to campaign that day as I don't have school because of Labor Day Big Grin )

Here is the updated Labeling Standards proposal:
Quote: SEEING THAT some companies may label their products incorrectly, or misuse words like ?fresh? and ?organic?, and also seeing that there is a rising number of people that need to be able to know what is in what they are eating, this proposal imposes the following:

I. If a product is marketed in one or multiple countries that speak different official languages, all labels on the product must be in all official languages of those countries, and must all translate to mean the same thing.

II. Defining ?fresh? as ?not stale, sour, or decayed? and ?not altered by processing,? and defining ?organic? as ?food produced with the use of feed or fertilizer of plant or animal origin without employment of chemically formulated fertilizers, growth stimulants, antibiotics, or pesticides.? Nothing may be labeled ?fresh? or ?organic? unless it fits the above definition.

III. All people have the right to know what is in the food they eat. This means all packaged products must be labeled with (if applicable) the ingredients of the product, and nutrition facts, which should include the amount of fat, trans fat, saturated fat, carbohydrates, sugars, sodium, protein, vitamins and minerals, and calories in the product. Also, all packaged products must be labeled with the country where the product was grown/made.[/quote]

Submitting today Big Grin


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 09-05-2005

So far I've telegrammed about 100 people...I'm going to send probably 100 more later today. And some tomorrow too. I'm hoping it can reach quorum this time Smile


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 09-08-2005

YESSS!!!!

Status: Quorum Reached: In Queue!

:wave: :wave: :wave:


Idea for UN Proposal - Groot Gouda - 09-08-2005

Congrats!

I'm fairly busy on the UN forums, but give us a nudge for the moral support when it comes up for vote (you'll need it Wink). Remember, there's a lot of experience here so don't be shy to use it!

Yay IDU!
:wave:


Idea for UN Proposal - Grosseschnauzer - 09-09-2005

Wasn't that on the first try?

If so that is impressive; even IDU proposals rarely pull that off on the first attempt.

:wave:


Idea for UN Proposal - Antrium - 09-09-2005

GrosseschnauzerSep 8 2005, 06:10 PM Wasn't that on the first try?

If so that is impressive; even IDU proposals rarely pull that off on the first attempt.

:wave: [/quote]
No, I submitted it twice. The first time I got about 75 approvals.